Search for: "In Re Biggers" Results 7601 - 7620 of 7,747
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2012, 8:29 am by The Book Review Editor
 However, Shawcross goes on to say that a bigger cause for the delay was “the ACLU and other such organizations . . . [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by John Elwood
But we’re going to have to leave those for Relist Watch SelectTM below, because I have to leave now to appear on a new talk show on the Gorilla Network. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm by admin
The failings of scholarship and analysis in DeVries have a bigger context.[2] The role of third parties – sophisticated intermediaries – received careful consideration in the First and Second Restatements of Torts, in Section 388 and its comments.[3] The Third Restatement continued to endorse this important defense, based upon the practical and sensible limits of liability, but placed the relevant discussion in a hard-to-find comment to a very broad, general section: “5. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 5:45 am by Andre Kwok
Hence, the ECCC’s residual functions present a new paradigm, where engagement, education, and visibility are equally integral to its mandate At the same time, young Cambodians have re-posted the Court’s TikTok content and created their own reels, filming themselves visiting the court and attending ECCC events, often adding their own remixed music, voice-overs, and reflections. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 3:00 am by Folkert Graafsma
 We will follow the structure of their three-part-blog and go from specifics (remedies interpretation) to some perceived bigger-picture problems (“ultra-hardline stare decisis“[7] etc.) and ask the question: are these sins, if they indeed exist, so cardinal that they justify and necessitate the killing of the AB? [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:51 pm by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
"High Court: Moderate user comments and you're liable" http://j.mp/dbZDmL more from the australian on #grogsgate ... [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:38 am
And, further, serves greatly to help preventAn outcry that holds something must be doneAbout judges whose thinking stops at 1891Or, if we're lucky, to a time as near as 1931.It also makes life easier for the mediaWhich need not carry in its head an encyclopediaOr even turn to a legal wikipediaTo learn context and background of a judge's other decisions,Facts that would tell the public -- which would develop derision -- That a judge almost always sends one to the chair, or for… [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:30 am by Patrick Non-White
Why would any reasonable person want to march the government in with heavy-handed regulatory requirements that depend on the judgment of unaccountable bureaucrats who often don’t have a clue what they’re doing; who will force prices down at the expense of innovation and impose additional business [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 3:29 pm by Giles Peaker
As Southwark's own internal communications set out in the Matthews Report reveal, the Housing dept did not think he was bringing a claim on his belongings but for re-entry. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:37 am by Kenneth Anderson
 The CIA statute defines “covert,” and it might or might not cover various things that the US might do (or being doing, for all I know) in Libya.But the bigger legal policy issue in US national security, as with Pakistan and other places, is that the CIA is engaged in actions that are properly described as (perhaps barely) politically “deniable,” but not “covert” in any true operational sense. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 7:28 am
I am asked from time to time about the pros and cons (and nuts and bolts) of starting a private law practice as a sole practitioner. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 1:21 am by Michael Lowe
From a criminal defense lawyer’s vantage point, it’s a bigger challenge to fight for someone’s freedom after they have been charged with a federal drug crime if for no other reason than they must face these pre-defined federal sentencing guidelines. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Brooke MacKenzie
But before diving into these topics, I propose to take a step back and first consider a bigger question: Why do we regulate lawyers the way we do—or at all? [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am by Steve Szentesi
Howe Institute Report – Reforming the Investment Canada Act: Walk More Softly, Carry a Bigger Stick). [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Steve Vladeck
Whatever the merits of the increasing reliance upon private military contractors (PMCs) for tasks that have historically been the province of the U.S. military, one of the major issues such reliance has raised is the accountability mechanisms for those contractors, especially through civil and criminal litigation. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 12:35 am
  The fancier the office, the bigger the building, the larger the parking lot, the larger the grounds that need to be maintained, the nicer the car your lawyer drives, the more your lawyers the law firm has intheir office, the more you pay as a client to cover those expenses. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 8:06 pm by Norman Gregory Fernandez
My only complaint would be that the room only had a 19” old style television, and not a newer bigger flat screen TV. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm by Josh Blackman
That passage ensures that members of Congress can't be appointed to any new "civil office" they created or accept such an office's bigger salary if they voted to increase it. [read post]