Search for: "In the Matter of: Brown"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 9,180
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2010, 4:39 am
The existence of triable issues of fact in the defendants' moving papers precludes a finding that they established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law sufficient to eliminate any material issues of fact (see Brown v Outback Steakhouse, 39 AD3d 450, 451; Gray v South Nassau Communities Hosp., 245 AD2d 337; Muscatello v City of New York, 215 AD2d 463, 464). [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:07 am
Even if you agree with the dissent (wait for it), bringing the false endorsement/right of publicity claims seems sufficient; especially if one’s remedies for multiple claims overlap, as here, and if extra causes of action raise difficult matters of proof, I can’t imagine why it would be malpractice to bring [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:45 am
” He contended that the district court abused its discretion in denying that motion.The circumstances of the case are indistinguishable from those presented in Nixon and Brown. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:42 pm
The matter was then sent to a judge for consideration, thereby landing in the lap of Justice Brown. [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:21 pm
It was then more faithful to Brown and more respectful of our precedent than it is today. [read post]
5 May 2010, 9:41 am
Today’s post is by Guest Baristas Melissa Kern and Austin Padgett, attorneys in Frost Brown Todd’s Trademark/Copyright Law Practice Group. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:07 am
SUMMARY OF THE FACTS This matter stems from a three-car accident which occurred on September 21, 2004 at approximately 9:30 a.m. on the eastbound side of the 5 freeway in the city of Sacramento. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:33 pm
But Arizona doesn’t count, anyway, because it’s just brown people getting stopped. [read post]
4 May 2010, 8:58 am
Well I have no idea what the underlying issue is, since Magistrate Judge Brown sealed the relevant pleadings, but this Order doesn't seem too good:This matter came before this Court on Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Emergency Motion for Protective Order (D.E. 386), filed November 6, 2009. [read post]
4 May 2010, 8:16 am
Remember, we have two defects in the sidewalk where Plaintiff Judy Brown tripped and fell. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:25 pm
"); Browning v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:04 am
The point was made by Justice Jackson, concurring in Brown v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 6:47 am
I shall ask my learned friend Mr Carl Gardner for his opinion on this matter. [read post]
2 May 2010, 10:30 pm
I often say that no matter how good the science is and no matter how good the business acumen is, if the public policy environment is not conducive to success you cannot succeed. [read post]
2 May 2010, 8:13 am
The defects consisted of a 1" rise in height, and an approximate 1" gap” between the pavers on the sidewalk (Supported by the Declarations of Judy Brown, Paragraphs 5-6 and Kenneth Brown, Paragraph 8; see also the photo exhibits which show the rise in height and the gap, attached as Exhibits 1 and 2 to Declarations of Judy Brown and Kenneth Brown). [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:58 am
When does identity matter? [read post]
2 May 2010, 4:46 am
I bought the elegant little brown Faber and Faber paperback while living in London for seven months in the year between college and law school. [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:16 pm
I tried other plants and I found that I was blacklisted.''Brown & Root, after all, always maintained that he was dismissed for dismal performance and has denied his allegations. [read post]
1 May 2010, 6:14 am
See Brown v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
If Paulson or GS could affect the outcome of the bet then that is another matter. [read post]
