Search for: "JOHN DOE (1)" Results 7601 - 7620 of 14,630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2016, 2:59 am by Peter Mahler
” “[T]here does not appear to be any obvious business purpose associated with altering the number of non-voting shares,” i.e., the company received no additional capitalization and the shareholders received no apparent benefit such as increased distributions. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:10 am by Terry Hart
He synthesizes the work of three influential philosophers — John Locke, Immanuel Kant, and John Rawls — to create his normative foundation of IP. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 7:47 am by Marcia Narine
An OECD pilot is also underway, although some believe that it will not succeed either because it does not go far enough or because it goes too far. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:21 pm by One LLP Staff
Grimaldi, which instructs the court to consider a two-part test: (1) does the mark’s use have any artistic relevance to the underlying work, and (2) if so, does the use explicitly mislead the public as to the source of the work? [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 11:32 pm by SOIssues
Logue does, and he does it intelligently. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:51 am
Integon then commenced this special proceeding against Reiffert, Biondi, Biondi's father, Biondi's unnamed uncle, and Allstate, Biondi's father's auto insurer, contending alternatively: (1) that the Biondi vehicle was insured under a policy issued to William Biondi, Melissa's father; or (2) that the Biondi vehicle was covered under an insurance policy issued to Melissa's uncle, respondent John Doe, with whom Biondi may have been residing at… [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 3:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
   Conceivably, a summary reversal could come during this Term, but, if that does not occur, the case very likely would go over to the next Term, starting October 1. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 10:51 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  In other cases, defendant will never be identified, thus leaving us with a john doe driver situation. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 3:21 pm
If the torture of John McCain was so terribly wrong, does that not make Barack Obama's defense of the basic rights of detainees right? [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 10:19 am by David Kopel
 The case was argued by Paul Clement and Alan Gura (for plaintiffs) and by John A. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In doing so, LaCroix does not minimize Americans’ concerns about disunion, nor does she ignore the very real threats they faced to their national order. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:38 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966)). [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Julie Hilden
Supreme Court recently declined to grant review in the very interesting case of Saint John’s Church in the Wilderness v. [read post]