Search for: "Johnson v State" Results 7601 - 7620 of 8,071
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
If civil rights lawyers begin invoking the principles elaborated and consolidated by popular spokesmen like Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey and  Richard Nixon and Everett Dirksen, and not only depend on the opinions of the Warren and Burger Courts, these justices may begin to embrace an originalist framework that provides this great legacy with a solid foundation in popular sovereignty.Supreme Court litigators have one overriding objective: getting five votes on their side. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
The state of things in totalitarian countries may induce us to revise this opinion. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am by INFORRM
  Here, though, it is a question of horizontal (person to person) rather than vertical rights (state to individual). [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:59 am by charonqc
” Modern politicians ‘as ego driven’ as the Romans This short discussion between a professor of classics and Boris Johnson is rather good, Terror suspects’ wives win European court ruling on state handouts Times: Curbs on state handouts to wives of terrorist suspects were ruled illegal yesterday by European judges and may have to be relaxed. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 11:14 am by sydniemery
Sentencing Guidelines to Justify Limiting the Impact of Johnson v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
Noting evidence that his office had a history of excluding minorities from the position and that decisionmakers, who claimed to have based the decision on qualifications, performed no interviews and reviewed no personnel records, a First Circuit panel found triable questions on pretext and reversed summary judgment for the government (Ahmed v Johnson, May 21, 2014, Lipez, K). [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:47 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States, which challenged Congress’s constitutional power to take land into trust under the Indian Reorganization Act. [read post]