Search for: "Labelle v. State"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 8,033
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2018, 8:24 am
The Chairman also stressed that ICOs should be viewed in the context of securities laws and that many ICOs claiming to be “utility tokens” may be securities, notwithstanding labels or the provision of some utility. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:36 am
Decision under appeal: added subject-matter, clarity and support by the description2.1 In Reasons 2.1 of the appealed decision, the examining division raised an objection under Article 123(2) EPC against feature (c) of claim 1 (cf. point V above). [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:32 am
Verdict: wrong. (9) As a result of the jury's guilty verdict in U.S. v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:04 am
That’s not the law, as the PragerU v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:34 am
United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
Justice Manmohan Singh of the Delhi High Court, in Arun Jaitley v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:46 am
In previous precedent, Bell v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
They previously were amici in Google v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
MacPherson v. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 9:18 am
IndiaBloomberg v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:35 pm
Troxel v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
For the most part, States tend not to label their sanctions as countermeasures. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 9:33 am
Commercial speech v. speaker—corporate entity v. person. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:24 pm
The rate of pay required for non-exempt employees is the regular rate during the pay period the leave is taken if the employer uses the workweek method, or alternatively the employer can use a 90-day lookback for determining the average regular rate, that is generally the same as with the normal state paid sick leave law (unless the employer has any flat-sum bonuses involved, in which case the employer will need to use the Alvarado-method of calculating the regular rate, as detailed here). [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
The division held that the subject-matter of claim 1 differed from the device of I2 […] in that it included the (additional and final) feature dealing with the relationship between the light output L and the signal level V. [read post]
