Search for: "MATTER OF BROWN"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 9,189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Below, we discuss the most significant aspects of Elena Kagan’s experience and writings as they relate to the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:29 pm
None of the documents specifically attributed any of the information contained therein to Mayer Brown or the partner involved in the matter. [read post]
7 May 2010, 7:11 am
It’s just a matter of who gets to grab the moral high ground during the opening rounds.) [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:53 am
Nelson, Does compliance matter? [read post]
7 May 2010, 4:39 am
The existence of triable issues of fact in the defendants' moving papers precludes a finding that they established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law sufficient to eliminate any material issues of fact (see Brown v Outback Steakhouse, 39 AD3d 450, 451; Gray v South Nassau Communities Hosp., 245 AD2d 337; Muscatello v City of New York, 215 AD2d 463, 464). [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:07 am
Even if you agree with the dissent (wait for it), bringing the false endorsement/right of publicity claims seems sufficient; especially if one’s remedies for multiple claims overlap, as here, and if extra causes of action raise difficult matters of proof, I can’t imagine why it would be malpractice to bring [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:45 am
” He contended that the district court abused its discretion in denying that motion.The circumstances of the case are indistinguishable from those presented in Nixon and Brown. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:42 pm
The matter was then sent to a judge for consideration, thereby landing in the lap of Justice Brown. [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:21 pm
It was then more faithful to Brown and more respectful of our precedent than it is today. [read post]
5 May 2010, 9:41 am
Today’s post is by Guest Baristas Melissa Kern and Austin Padgett, attorneys in Frost Brown Todd’s Trademark/Copyright Law Practice Group. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:07 am
SUMMARY OF THE FACTS This matter stems from a three-car accident which occurred on September 21, 2004 at approximately 9:30 a.m. on the eastbound side of the 5 freeway in the city of Sacramento. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:33 pm
But Arizona doesn’t count, anyway, because it’s just brown people getting stopped. [read post]
4 May 2010, 8:58 am
Well I have no idea what the underlying issue is, since Magistrate Judge Brown sealed the relevant pleadings, but this Order doesn't seem too good:This matter came before this Court on Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Emergency Motion for Protective Order (D.E. 386), filed November 6, 2009. [read post]
4 May 2010, 8:16 am
Remember, we have two defects in the sidewalk where Plaintiff Judy Brown tripped and fell. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:25 pm
"); Browning v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:04 am
The point was made by Justice Jackson, concurring in Brown v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 6:47 am
I shall ask my learned friend Mr Carl Gardner for his opinion on this matter. [read post]
2 May 2010, 10:30 pm
I often say that no matter how good the science is and no matter how good the business acumen is, if the public policy environment is not conducive to success you cannot succeed. [read post]
2 May 2010, 8:13 am
The defects consisted of a 1" rise in height, and an approximate 1" gap” between the pavers on the sidewalk (Supported by the Declarations of Judy Brown, Paragraphs 5-6 and Kenneth Brown, Paragraph 8; see also the photo exhibits which show the rise in height and the gap, attached as Exhibits 1 and 2 to Declarations of Judy Brown and Kenneth Brown). [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:58 am
When does identity matter? [read post]
