Search for: "Mark"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 151,845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2012, 12:51 am
Mark Elliott is a Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Cambridge. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 10:13 am
” Unfortunately, this ordinance completely misses the mark and has virtually nothing to do with owner responsibility. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:50 pm
Mark Vinall is a barrister at Blackstone Chambers. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 11:28 am
The system got its best marks for “treating all people fairly, regardless of race,” but even as to that, 27% of respondents said that the system was doing a poor job, while an additional 30% gave the system only a “fair. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:39 am
These trade marks included various marks consisting of the letters MG and device marks containing the letters MG and an octagonal logo -- marks that were associated with the once-famous British MG sports cars. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:13 am
Ford opposed, citing earlier Community trade marks for the word KA and the figurative mark containing the word KA (illustrated, left). [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 3:43 am
As to the cited mark, the word "BEDLAM! [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 1:14 am
Although Applicant sought to register the mark for vehicle accessories, it did so based upon an alleged bona fide intent to use the mark in connection with those goods, and the Board found no evidence that the design had been used or registered in connection with any other goods or services. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:44 am
Therefore the marks at issue look and sound differently. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 3:53 am
The Board acknowledged that Samjen’s mark and the cited marks are distinct in appearance and sound. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 3:26 am
Turning to the issue of the similarity or dissimilarity between the marks, the Board observed that [w]hile the marks have some obvious differences in sight and sound, they all end with the term SPADE/S. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:14 pm
Mark told her that he would not marry her without a PMA. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 3:14 am
The Board focused on opposer's registered mark THE BEAUTY CHANNEL as the mark most similar to applicant's mark, noting that if confusion is not likely as to that mark, then there is no need to consider the other two registered marks (BEAUTY EVERYWHERE and SYNCHRONIZING BEAUTY).The Board first found that applicant's services (providing information about beauty) encompassed those of opposer. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 3:48 am
- ed.].Comparing the Marks: The Board found that the marks look different. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 3:24 am
Finally, the Board observed that the refusal to register does not affect applicant's right to use the subject mark, but only his right to register.This case is solely about whether the applicant may 'call upon the resources of the federal government' to obtain federal registration of the mark on the Principal Register in order to assist in enforcement of the mark. [read post]
23 May 2014, 3:03 am
The opposed mark does not share that connotation, and overall the marks create different commercial impressions. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:21 am
" It argued that registrant sells candy under its mark solely for fundraising purposes, “and thus, a consumer searching for products in connection with the Cited Mark would not come across the applied-for mark where the goods are sold wholesale/retail. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:47 am
" "In rare cases, alliterative marks, or those with a rhyming or other sound pattern, can encourage persons encountering the mark to perceive the mark as a whole. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:58 am
The Board observed that an invalid assignment can result in "abandonment" only if the invalid assignment "causes the mark ... to lose its significance as a mark. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 5:24 am
Strength of Opposer's Mark: Opposer claimed that its marks are famous, but its evidence fell short. [read post]
