Search for: "People v Goode"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 20,040
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2010, 9:40 am
” The more people use their iPhones the more people who don’t have one feel nudged to get one. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:00 pm
See also United States v Mojica, 62 AD3d 100, 110 (2d Dept) ("the defendant may not assert a due process challenge contending that the statute is vague as applied to the conduct of others (see Broadrick v Oklahoma, 413 US 601, 608 [1973]; People v Shack, 86 NY2d 529, 538 [1995]; People v Nelson, 69 NY2d 302, 308 [1987]. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
"], lv to appeal denied, 13 NY3d 748 [2009]; People v Abdullah, 23 Misc 3d 232, 234 (Crim Ct, Kings County 2008] ["Because New York does not have a complete ban on the possession of handguns in the home... [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
But on the long list of To-Dos, after buy more Cheddar Bunnies, most people do not have “File baby’s name as a trade mark with the USPTO”. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:39 am
Mr Condliff’s local PCT only provides the expensive gastric bypass surgery routinely to people with a BMI over 50. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 3:33 am
With turmoil aplenty in the blawgosphere over the past week, stemming from the discovery of settling Rakofsky v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:15 am
Holder v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:03 am
Guido v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:58 am
In another 5-4 decision, though borne of strange bedfellows, the Supreme Court has reversed in Bullcoming v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:05 pm
Oatmeal v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:48 am
My objection is not to gay people; it is towards the nature of the homosexual political agenda and the vicious and degrading tactics of some activists. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 7:27 am
The first, Bucklew v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 9:36 am
In Warner v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:45 am
(Eugene Volokh) In Pucci v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:44 am
One of the cases I discussed in that article was Constant A. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:51 am
In Fridman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:18 pm
As Patrick referenced, the Supreme Court recently struck down another censorious law in U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:49 am
Sounds good to me. [read post]
3 May 2016, 7:48 am
Clause 28 …No voyage shall be undertaken, nor any goods or cargoes loaded, that would expose the vessel to capture or seizure by rulers or governments. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:08 pm
Here is another, Stadter v. [read post]
