Search for: "People v. Downs" Results 7601 - 7620 of 16,918
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2014, 12:19 pm by Robert C. Lehrman
The case is called Nowrouzi et. al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:57 am by SHG
So they could have waited him out, talked him down, gotten a shrink to help or, well, let’s cut to the chase. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 12:09 pm by Eric Citron
 This year’s intellectual property blockbuster, Alice Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 pm by Orin Kerr
The Eleventh Circuit has handed down an important new ruling on cell phone searches at the border, United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:10 am by Larkin Reynolds
-controlled portion will be used to “interrogate people seized from countries outside Afghanistan. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 9:28 am by privacylawyer
There is a case from Ontario called R. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am by Kelly
The People) Viacom – Viacom, FAPL and Amici File briefs in Viacom v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 5:52 am by Greg Lambert
Greg Lambert 6:11 And typically, this would be like a knowledge management team that has worked with the individual practice areas to I mean, to some to dumb it down a little bit. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:19 am by Eugene Volokh
Father’s decision to place daughter in public school arose, at least in part, from his concern that her home school experience did not allow her adequate exposure to differing viewpoints, including people who do not share her religious faith. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post,  The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).Edward A. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
The test was devised by Justice Stewart in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:41 am
While Congress has bickered and blathered, the least democratic branch has done much of the work of the people, stepping in with a series of landmark patent rulings that have undermined the excessive clout wielded by patent holders, with rulings that strip them of the automatic right to shut down their rivals' businesses when they infringe (eBay v MercExchange, 2006) and tighten the standard for proving that an invention deserves patent protection in the first place… [read post]