Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 7601 - 7620 of 12,220
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2013, 11:13 pm by Jeff Gamso
   Mitchell v City of Henderson et al Complaint by dmataconis h/t Randazza and Ilya Somin at Volokh [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 3:53 am by David DePaolo
I'm sure that the good people that work at the California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) are busy folks, but someone there needs to get a good diary system to avoid losing meritorious cases on procedural lapses due to expiration of time limits.Follow these facts and let me know if you don't agree that CIGA has some file management issues.JoAnn Lutz suffered industrial injuries in 1999 and 2000 while working as a personal assistant and caregiver for Linda McDonald, one of the owners… [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 10:13 am
In determining whether or not the court would grant the hardship license, the court put much weight into People v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:20 am by Marta Requejo
Section III states the facts and legal consequences of the case Mubende-Neumann, a procedure of massive eviction that took place in Uganda in 2001, where the Government, after signing an agreement with a firm of German origin, expelled in a particularly brutal and violent way more than two thousand people from the lands they occupied, and delivered them to a branch of the above-cited corporation. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 2:33 pm by Betsy McKenzie
It took some courage for Justice Kennedy to write this, and it will be a very important decision. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:57 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defendant was asked to recite the alphabet from "C" to "V". [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:14 am by Jon Gelman
Food and Drug Administration, in partnership with international regulatory and law enforcement agencies, took action this week against more than 9,600 websites that illegally sell potentially dangerous, unapproved prescription medicines to consumers. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
But pursuing litigation with little to no damages is sure to draw the ire of a busy district judge.The second case, Patch Rubber Co. v. [read post]