Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 178,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2021, 5:36 am
Where a sheriff’s deputy owed a duty to the public at large, but not to plaintiff specifically, to protect cars from running into a downed tree on a state highway, the Public Duty Doctrine barred plaintiff’s GTLA suit and dismissal of plaintiff’s case was affirmed. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:36 am
The court also dealt at length with plaintiff's free exercise claims. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 9:40 am
Plaintiff says that Nikolay had some naked/sex pictures of plaintiff and distributed them to others, as well as threatened to send them to plaintiff's employer. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 10:24 am
.) -- ruling that: (1) plaintiff was not required to exhaust administrative remedies to maintain a pattern-or-practice claim alleging delays in responses by the Federal Bureau of Prisons to counsel requests for client records; (2) government was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff’s pattern-or-practice claim because plaintiff failed to rebut defendant’s evidence that it did not have a policy or practice of violating FOIA; and (3) in the… [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 4:10 am
Finally, plaintiff’s continued anonymity will jeopardize defendants’ legitimate concern that they will be unable to engage in meaningful discovery to explore the factual basis of plaintiff’s allegation that she was offended by defendants’ conduct. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 6:47 am
, and placed the plaintiff's name on the commissioner's child abuse and neglect central registry (registry). [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 7:07 am
The court denied defendants' motion to compel the production of documents regarding plaintiff's communications with litigation-funding organizations that plaintiff withheld as privileged. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:51 pm
("This appeal arises from a breach of contract claim filed by the plaintiff...against the defendant...for the defendant’s failure to provide coverage for damage caused to the plaintiff’s home by a ruptured sanitary pipe. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:32 pm
Tinkes, the plaintiff's car crashed into the back of the defendant's commercial pickup truck. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:41 am
§ 114(r); (2) TSA properly relied on Exemption 6 to withhold names of certain TSA agents associated with screening plaintiff; (3) agency performed adequate search in response to plaintiff’s request; and (4) plaintiff could not challenge agency’s Glomar response as to whether plaintiff appeared on terrorist watch lists, because he failed to raise the issue in his administrative appeal. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
As explained below, the Court also denied plaintiff’s claim for unjust enrichment. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 7:00 am
The defendant specifically challenges the plaintiff’s standing to bring this action. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 11:13 am
.) -- dismissing lawsuit because plaintiff did not submit the request and the requester (plaintiff's lawyer) failed to indicate that the request was made on behalf of a client generally or plaintiff specifically. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
.), the court denied a Plaintiff's motion to remand a federal court UIM claim back to the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas.In its Motion for Remand, the Plaintiff contended that the claims presented did not meet the $75,000 federal court jurisdictional limit.After reviewing the current status of federal law pertaining to motions for remand against the allegations in the Plaintiff's Complaint, the court noted that the record before the court… [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 1:52 pm
.) -- finding that: (1) FBI timely responded to plaintiff’s request by regular mail to plaintiff’s last known address, rejecting plaintiff’s argument that he was entitled to a response via email; (2) FBI performed a reasonable search for records concerning plaintiff, who provided no evidence that agency had responsive records; and (3) U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:14 am
In granting in part plaintiff's motion for enhanced damages, the court rejected defendant's argument that enhanced damages would cause severe prejudice because defendant's profits from the accused product were "not much more" that the awarded damages. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 5:28 am
The court denied plaintiff's motion to exclude testimony from defendant's damages expert which "converts Google’s grant of equity (2% of its stock) into a running royalty. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:05 am
Within hours after Monday's U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:45 am
Supreme Court’s decision in TC Heartland v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 5:16 am
Plaintiff’s putative class action sought to represent “the class of individuals who made purchases at Defendant’s stores…and who received receipts on which Defendant printed more than the last five digits of the person’s credit card or debit card number, or on which Defendant printed the expiration date of the person’s credit or debit card. [read post]
