Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 7601 - 7620 of 55,734
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2022, 10:06 am by Tim De Chant
The company announced an “innovation fund” this week that places bets on a couple of key technologies, chief among them RISC-V, a free, open source instruction set that shows promise in low-power and embedded systems, markets that are expected to grow significantly over the next several years.Read 10 remaining paragraphs | Comments [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 2:19 am by Florian Mueller
However, U.S. governments traditionally advocate robust patent enforcement in trade talks, regardless of which party is in power. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Civil Rights”—Motley litigated hundreds of cases that remade American law and society, including Brown v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The United Kingdom has, historically, had one of the most stable systems of government, in no small part because of the strength of our unwritten constitution which at its core is based around the ‘separation of powers’. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 12:56 pm by fjhinojosa
Murphy’s article Eight Things Americans Can’t Figure Out About Controlling Administrative Power is cited in the following article: Emily S. [read post]
The CPSC continued its long-running effort to curb the dangers associated with high-powered magnets in 2021, making progress in two key enforcement battles. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:01 am by Daphne Keller
The Israeli Supreme Court recently rejected a challenge to Israel’s version of this system, in a case called Adalah v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 7:01 am by Jack Goldsmith, Oona Hathaway
Authors’ note: This post draws on an amicus brief we submitted in support of the pending petition for certiorari in Edgar v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 5:50 am by Jennifer Moore
In the case of A v A [2004] EWHC 142 the father issued an application for a joint residence order and a defined contact Order. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 5:19 am by JURIST Staff
Private nuisance is “interference” with someone’s “use or enjoyment of land that is both substantial and unreasonable” (Antrim Truck Centre Ltd. v Ontario (Ministry of Transportation) 2013 SCC 13 at para 18, my underlining). [read post]