Search for: "Robert Thomas" Results 7601 - 7620 of 10,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2011, 11:46 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Mark Lemley (Stanford)Thomas Field (New Hampshire)Ted Sichelman (UCSD)Peter Menell (Berkeley)Robert Merges (Berkeley)Lee Petherbridge (Loyola)Gregory Mandel (Temple)Dennis Crouch (Missouri)Scott Hemphill (Columbia)Dan Burk (Irvine)Rochelle Dreyfuss (NYU)Jason Rantanen (Iowa)Jay Kesan (Illinois)Shamnad Basheer (West Bengal National University)James Bessen (Research on Innovation)Gideon Parchomovsky (Penn)Ralph Clifford (U Mass Dartmouth)Jonathan Masur (Chicago)Ronald Mann… [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:22 am by California Stem Cell Report
Voting for Thomas were Floyd Bloom, Jacob Levin (alternate for Sue Bryant), Michael Friedman, Michael Goldberg, Philip Pizzo, Stephen Juelsgaard, Robert Klein, Sherry Lansing, Robert Quint, David Serrano [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:00 am by Julia Zebley
Justice Clarence Thomas delivered the opinion of the court, except for Part III-B-2, which only Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel... [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:28 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The dissent is by Justice Kennedy joined by Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Breyer and Alito. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:23 am by FDABlog HPM
In a 5-4, 20-page landmark majority decision delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas (joined in full by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia and Alito and and as to all except for Part III-B-2 by Justice Kennedy), the Court invoked the doctrine of impossibility preemption to hold that federal drug regulations applicable to generic drug manufacturers directly conflict with, and thus preempt, state tort-law claims based on drug manufacturers’ alleged failure to provide… [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:25 am by California Stem Cell Report
Shortly after he and his wife were seated in the audience, outgoing Chairman Robert Klein [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:03 am
And Chief Justice Roberts issued a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito joined. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:33 am by Eugene Volokh
On the other side are three conservatives (formerly Kennedy, Rehnquist, and O’Connor, and now Kennedy, Roberts, and Alito) plus one liberal (Breyer), who have taken a narrower view of both. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 5:16 am by Rob Robinson
http://t.co/DU6iuu7 (Leonard Deutchman) Technology and Tactics 6 Ways to Make Your Next IT Audit a Success - http://tinyurl.com/3rh5shx (B&L Blog) 82% of Conversations Word of Mouth Reputation are Face-to-Face - http://t.co/HsLYGJC (Kevin O'Keefe) An ECM Perspective on ERM: Your Penchant for Over Retaining is Costing You - http://t.co/3wkJ99z (Susan Goodman) An Update on Cloud Service Provider Controls - http://tinyurl.com/3qcmqzm (Thomas Shaw) Authentication Bug Briefly Makes… [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:07 pm by Dianne Saxe
Unsurprisingly, the four opposed are Roberts, Scalia, Thomas and Alito. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Aaron Pelley
United States: In an opinion written by Justice Alito, joined by Justices Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Kagan, the Court upheld a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule for searches conducted in violation of a defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:58 am by Nabiha Syed
Briefly: The Blog of Legal Times reports on a panel on the Roberts Court and the First Amendment, held last weekend at the American Constitution Society’s annual meeting. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:11 pm by Lovechilde
“Justice Roberts famously said this is about balls and strikes, well, the Roberts court is moving the pitching mound for plaintiffs down to second base, and out to center field. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:19 pm by Jonathan Kalmuss-Katz
  Four members of the Court (presumably Justices Alito, Roberts, Thomas and Scalia) would have barred the suit on standing or other jurisdictional grounds, while four others (presumably Justices Kagan, Breyer, Ginsburg and Kennedy) affirmed plaintiffs’ standing. [read post]