Search for: "S. H. L. "
Results 7601 - 7620
of 10,139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2011, 11:20 am
(h/t: Instapundit) Read the whole article, but here's the last graf: Garrett ends by reviewing the most promising bipartisan reforms that seek to increase the accuracy and reliability of criminal convictions, like North Carolina’s Actual Innocence Commission, which has required the recording of homicide interrogations, expanded the procedures for preserving evidence and increased defendants’ access to DNA testing. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:52 am
L. [read post]
27 May 2011, 12:30 pm
Deidun, S. [read post]
27 May 2011, 12:02 pm
CEO William L. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:00 am
Martins, and John L. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am
Ryan (Southern Methodist University) Discussant: Richard H. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:14 am
L. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:00 am
§ 2680(h). [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:56 pm
ahsî hürriyeti s? [read post]
26 May 2011, 12:36 pm
Bush's sneering reference to "the L-word") hardly made it easier to be a "progressive. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:03 am
(h) All advertisements shall include the name, principal law office address and telephone number of the lawyer or law firm whose services are being offered. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:22 am
Salzburg, Wyoming Attorney General; Terry L. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:13 am
L. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:49 am
BGE 136 II 165 E. 1.2.1 S. 170; 136 IV 92 E. 4 S. 95 ).Hier waren die Voraussetzungen nicht erfüllt, weil das Bundesgericht keinen Endentscheid zur Erledigung des Verfahrens hätte fällen können und kein nicht wieder gutzumachender Nachteil drohte. [read post]
24 May 2011, 2:10 pm
Int’l Trade Comm’n, (2010-1176). [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:58 am
Countervailing Considerations If we assume that Part A results in greater proportionality—and hence greater justice—there would have to be some compelling reason to justify withholding the amendment’s benefits from the thousands of imprisoned individuals who were sentenced under the previous, less proportionate regime. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:00 am
Montserrat International Extradition Treaty with the United States June 8, 1972, Date-Signed January 21, 1977, Date-In-Force (The treaty applicable to Montserrat was signed with the United Kingdom.) [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:13 am
§ 210.42(h)(2). [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:00 am
Bix, Mahr Agreements: Contracting in the Shadow of Family Law (and Religious Law)—A Comment on Oman’s Article, 1 Wake Forest L. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
Tapan Banerjee AIR 1986 P&H 113, Ram Sarup v. [read post]
