Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 21,157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2016, 12:40 pm
The decision in Camp’s Grocery, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:36 am
Western Sugar Coop. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 5:46 pm
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 7:06 am
In Hong-Chuan Lin v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 7:06 am
In Hong-Chuan Lin v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:25 pm
., Appellants, v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:49 am
Martens v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:44 am
Slip Op., Casper Sleep, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:44 am
Slip Op., Casper Sleep, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
In Gonzales v. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 3:26 am
”The current law: summaryOverall, one might conclude that on the existing law:(i) Prejudice to the owner is part of the actus reus (that is, the objective conditions for the offence rather than the mental state – mens rea - of the offender);(ii) Prejudice need not necessarily be economic;(iii) It can be direct as well as indirect;(iv) It is not an onerous standard;(v) It might require more than… [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:25 pm
In Grant v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:25 pm
In Grant v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
In this case, the act complained of was an offer for sale in England, on the principles laid down in L’Oreal v eBay, i.e. the defendant’s website was not merely accessible from the UK but was in fact targeted at (among others) English customers.The allegedly infringing product on Heritage Audio's sitePassing-offFor passing-off, the judge noted that the CJEU had applied the Brussels I rules not only to trade mark and copyright infringement claims but also to claims… [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:10 pm
Cenlar FSB v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
In the case of R (Ingenious Media) v HMRC ([2016] UKSC 54) UK Supreme Court held that information provided by taxpayers to HMRC is confidential and that HMRC acted unlawfully by disclosing such information to journalists. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am
Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to rebut the… [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm
New from the University Press of Kansas: The Great Yazoo Lands Sale: The Case of Fletcher v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 1:02 pm
The court found that the majority of the claims sounded in fraud, and the alleged misrepresentations and omissions were made "in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security" (Luis v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 6:51 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. [read post]
