Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 27,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2012, 4:30 am
Bank v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:59 am
§ 946a (2018), report for FY18 states (at 9) that “[o]f the 502 cases in which findings were entered in FY18, 246 of them, or 51 percent, included sexual misconduct related offenses (Articles 120, 120b, and 120c). [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:37 am
Williams v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:04 am
Code § 12182(b)(2)(A)(iii). [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:04 am
Code § 12182(b)(2)(A)(iii). [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:04 am
Code § 12182(b)(2)(A)(iii). [read post]
19 May 2023, 11:25 am
Kevin Stitt recently vetoed Oklahoma Senate Bill 429, passed by the state legislature with near unanimous bipartisan support to prohibit discriminatory graduation dress codes. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:00 pm
The goal of nationwide uniformity driving the Sentencing Guidelines is not well-served when we apply an enhancement for all burglaries in one state but none in California, our most populous state. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Code Ann. tit. 8, § 112, which ostensibly permits companies to provide proxy access by amending corporate bylaws. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 8:35 am
In Ramberg v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 2:04 pm
Espinosa relies on Traveler's Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:30 am
Howard Norton v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm
The mere cross-reference to provisions of the United States Code and Code of Federal Regulations does not specifically describe the acts addressed by the injunction. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:36 am
The California Court of Appeal ruled in People v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:40 pm
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 10:48 pm
In Dumont v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:41 pm
Additionally, the Plaintiffs sued the Corporate Defendants for negligence in hiring, training, and supervision, negligence, violations of the Maryland Business Occupations and Professions Code, and breach of contract. [read post]
15 May 2009, 12:30 pm
Proposition 65, as interpreted by the Court of Appeal in AFL-CIO v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
Independent of Section 2115, California courts have applied the following provisions of the California Corporations Code to foreign corporations: Section 1600 (shareholder inspection rights), Valtz v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:49 am
Code, § 6250 et seq. [read post]