Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 7601 - 7620 of 55,070
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2022, 3:25 am by SHG
That’s the nature of law, in general, and crim law, in particular, that it’s molded around people who aren’t sympathetic and did things that were, well, heinous. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
These are questions that people in England and Wales should give consideration to in taking stock of s 1 of their Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:56 pm by Elena Kagan, Alan Z. Rozenshtein
The plaintiffs emphasized that the defendants could be held liable under even the highly speech-protective standard of Brandenburg v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 10:29 am by Karen Gullo
The SFPD flouted a law meant to bring democratic control over government access to privacy-intrusive camera networks that can be used, as they were here, to spy on people exercising their First Amendment right to protest.EFF uncovered evidence showing the SFPD broke the law when it obtained and used a  business district’s network of more than 300 video surveillance cameras to conduct remote, live surveillance of Black-led protests for eight days in May and June… [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 9:38 am by Patrick A. Salvi
Joel: There’s no evil villain necessarily on the other side of the V. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 8:09 am by Josh Blackman
But the Constitution was ordained and established by We the People precisely so that it would bind us and our governments as law—the highest of our laws. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am by Camilla Hrdy
It's an odd way to entice people to register...JL: Well, we borrowed incontestability from England, where it works. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 3:30 am by Brian Bix
As Baker writes: “Contemporary family law scholarship … often assume[s] that a functional approach to family law … is the best way to secure equal treatment for people who live in relationships that have not been recognize legally as familial. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
You think you can prevent my candidate from joining the Court and reversing Roe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 8:27 pm by Dennis Crouch
The defendant had been telling people that plaintiff was an infringer; plaintiff sued for defamation. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
  In Bento v The Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police [2012] EWHC 1525 (QB) Mr Justice Bean (as he then was) summarised the position:- “[101]...it is recognised at common law that a person may publish, in good faith, false and defamatory statements about another in reply to an attack by that other, and as a defence to that attack. [read post]