Search for: "True v. United States" Results 7601 - 7620 of 9,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2008, 3:03 pm
” That, however, is simply not true. [read post]
All was fine until the United States Postal Service (USPS) signed a deal with Amazon under which it would deliver Amazon packages on Sundays. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 2:03 am
United States, No. 2008-5022 (Jan. 16, 2009) held that the federal government was not liable in inverse condemnation for taking property damaged by Southern California wildfires in 2003. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:40 am by Sonya Hubbard
 Hopefully that’s true, but the deal will yield a pretty nice payout for the executive officers and directors of Alberto Culver, too. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
This is particularly significant since Opposers' "primary activities are admittedly performed outside the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:33 pm by Florian Mueller
And the only way to find out is to let push come to shove.Judge Koh may dread the notion but we'll probably see more Apple v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 1:30 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Another factor that at least potentially could encourage these trends is legal developments in the United States, particularly the U.S. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:15 am
See United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:27 am
The root of American governmental power is revealed most clearly in the instance of the power conferred by the Constitution upon the Judiciary of the United States, and specifically upon this Court. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 1:26 pm by Tom Parker
Since 1783 there has only been one standard in the United States for incarceration and that is conviction in a court of law. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 4:55 am
Shortly afterwards, the profile was deleted by MySpace.As you would expect a judge to know, parodies of public officials are protected free speech under the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 12:02 pm by Orin Kerr
He has written and joined decisions that greatly enraged the “traditional liberal legal elites,” such as Citizens United and and Parents Involved v. [read post]