Search for: "United States v. California" Results 7601 - 7620 of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Ben
District Judge Phillip Gutierrez ruled against SiriusXM in 2014, holding that California state law, as it is written, gives the master recording owner exclusive performance rights.In Florida a court found that there was no state law to protect pre-1972 recorded works. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:23 pm by Amy Howe
The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Janus v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Forest Laboratories, a case from the Lexapro MDL, the court agreed with defendant’s argument that per Bartlett, the United States Supreme Court has held that design defect claims involving pharmaceutical products are preempted. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 1:24 am
Supreme Court in the 1943 case of United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Humanitarian Law Project seems to reject this: United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
IN THE NEWS California Governor Gavin Newsom signed two bills into law banning people from carrying firearms in public places and raising taxes on guns and ammunition sold in the state. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:19 am by Robert Liles
State regulators across the country have expressed concern that mobile dental units will be used to collect as much money as possible while leaving dangerous conditions untreated. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 2:20 pm
On Monday, April 16, the Court will hear argument in Powerex Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:43 pm by Emily Hammond
There, the Supreme Court upheld a California moratorium on new nuclear power plants within the state until the United States developed a means of disposing of spent nuclear fuel. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
United States – which he describes as a “rare criminal case where the defendant is right” – and Sprint Communications v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:29 am by Marissa Miller
” At UPI, Michael Kirkland discusses the impact of the Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]