Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 7601 - 7620
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2011, 10:35 am
Merpel quips, soon we'll have as many rulings on "communication to the public" as we have on "use of a sign" in trade mark law. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
Becton, Dickinson and Company (Patently-O) Patent malpractice litigation: State versus federal jurisdiction: Magnetek, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
In case you're wondering why this topic has been chosen, it has been quite controversial in the United States and, in a recent judgment in Och-Ziff, Mr Justice Arnold considered that it was actually part of both EU and United Kingdom trade mark law. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 2:42 pm
Rarely does the IPKat find a single illustration that so aptly combines two unrelated news items as on this occasion The United States has a unitary patent system that appears to cover all 50 States, together with the District of Columbia and a handful of other offshore locations. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 11:57 am
” United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Reyno, a wrongful death action was brought in United States federal courts on behalf of the Scottish victims of an air crash against the American manufacturer in United States federal court.[14] In the Piper decision, the Court seems to have attempted to moderate its approach to forum non conveniens with an acknowledgement that there is nothing in the ruling which compels courts to ignore the possibility of an unfavorable change in law. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Reyno, a wrongful death action was brought in United States federal courts on behalf of the Scottish victims of an air crash against the American manufacturer in United States federal court.[14] In the Piper decision, the Court seems to have attempted to moderate its approach to forum non conveniens with an acknowledgement that there is nothing in the ruling which compels courts to ignore the possibility of an unfavorable change in law. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:19 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
Mar.22, 2011) (citation & quotation marks omitted); see United Mine Workers of Am. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm
Amazon (ArsTechnica) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) TTAB: Fame of PING mark brings TTAB 2(d) victory over PING WI FI: Karsten Manufacturing Corporation v D Kent Pingel (TTABlog) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Coventry First – Coventry First withdraws twittersquatting lawsuit against @Coventryfirst: Coventry First, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm
Amazon (ArsTechnica) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) TTAB: Fame of PING mark brings TTAB 2(d) victory over PING WI FI: Karsten Manufacturing Corporation v D Kent Pingel (TTABlog) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Coventry First – Coventry First withdraws twittersquatting lawsuit against @Coventryfirst: Coventry First, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:38 pm
United States, , 518 F.2d 584, 587 (Ct. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am
Before I quickly run through my constitutional views – which don’t differ much from Judge Carlos Bea’s partial dissent in the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:42 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
L’Oréal has identified various forms of infringement, including, inter alia, the sale and offer for sale, to consumers in the EU, of goods bearing L’Oréal’s trade marks intended, by L’Oréal, for sale in third States (parallel importation).The High Court (United Kingdom), before which the dispute is pending, has asked the Court of Justice a number of questions concerning the obligations to which a company operating an internet… [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 1:33 pm
” Pentalpha appealed to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:15 am
In April 2011, the United States Supreme Court provided a potential escape hatch for employers. [read post]
