Search for: "Caming v. United States" Results 7621 - 7640 of 9,171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
United States, the Court ruled that the use of informant testimony is constitutional so long as any statements allegedly made by the defendant are made voluntarily. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm by Amy Howe
(The Judicial Conference of the United States, which makes policy for federal courts, recently announced a new policy intended to crack down on this type of “judge-shopping. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:48 am
In fact, I can state the unequivocal belief that that day would absolutely never come. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:10 pm
Supreme Court case about the presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:20 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
  The most iconic case about presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 8:04 am
Complicating desegregation even further: a 2007 United States Supreme Court ruling that restricted schools in selecting students. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 2:06 am
There are instructive parallels, he argues, between the imperialism of "old Europe" (not his phrase) and that of Japan, and of the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:36 am by David Oscar Markus
In a 2010 ruling, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in Philadelphia, said a judge could require the authorities to obtain a warrant based on probable cause before demanding cellphone records or location information from a provider. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm by Benson Varghese
In the United States, once a juror is officially empaneled and sworn in for a trial, they cannot simply “quit” or voluntarily leave their duty without facing potential legal consequences. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:37 am by admin
Condon with 437 cases  4.6% of total cases The top 10 most active panelists are all from the United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 11:38 am by Josh Blackman
To take a more recent example, Steve Vladeck, a chronic critic of the shadow docket, filed an amicus brief in one of the many United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, IFP began trying to not only claim that they had an implied license to use the music and that it wasn’t responsible for work licensed elsewhere and imported into the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 1:44 am by Steve Lubet
            In 1949, federal district trial Judge Harold Medina issued criminal contempt specifications against the five lawyers representing the eleven members of the Communist Party tried and convicted of conspiracy in the case titled United States v. [read post]