Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 44,320
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2020, 7:45 pm
Justice Kirstjanson grounded her decision in international legal principles such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which was endorsed by the Supreme Court of Canada in A.C. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 4:33 pm
” United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm
Elgizouli v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] 2 WLR 857 The case concerns the UK’s stance on the application of mutual legal assistance to the United States where doing so may result in the death penalty being carried out. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 11:20 am
Oct. 21, 2020): “because the infringing act of downloading the material occurred on a computer outside the United States, there was no act in the United States to establish jurisdiction” * Donat v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:55 am
Last week, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware ruled that this "passive" ownership and operation does not constitute a volitional act and, thus, does not constitute actionable copyright infringement. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 9:22 am
Case citation: State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 1:38 pm
Mehta in Nunes v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 4:15 am
In C.F. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 7:41 pm
Neither Wisconsin nor the United States has introduced data sufficient to show that disarming all nonviolent felons substantially advances its interest in keeping the public safe. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 7:19 pm
Most jurisdictions in the United States have the concept of “waiving service. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 12:16 pm
In Valentine v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 10:49 am
Of note, at the outset of its analysis, the BCCA stated that in cases that did not involve final determination of a case that originated before the SCC issued Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 6:11 am
On December 14, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Adaptive Streaming Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
This provision does not take effect until the state elects to participate in this section and becomes effective on the later of the date of election or the enactment of this provision. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Tallent v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 1:27 pm
In General Medicine, P.C. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 12:46 pm
Mrs Nur does not work because of her caring responsibilities for Z and is therefore in receipt of state welfare benefits. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:15 am
This sentiment was expressed in our decision in Shepp v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
by Dennis Crouch Caterpillar v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 3:15 pm
The regulation’s authors write that this abbreviated comment period is required to deal with the “threats to United States national interests” posed by these technologies, but they provide no factual basis for this claim. [read post]