Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 13,860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2014, 11:30 am
County of San Diego (10/29/14, D064243) On October 29, 2014, the Fourth District California Court of Appeal unanimously affirmed the trial court’s decision in favor of Sierra Club, agreeing that the County of San Diego’s adopted Climate Action Plan (CAP) violated CEQA. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:55 pm
But our construction of “support surface” does not give claim 1 the same scope as claim 6. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 12:37 pm
It is does not establish any attorney-client relationship nor provide or serve as a substitute for legal advice to any individual or organization. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:10 am
§ 924(j)(1), among other offenses. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
The statement of claim was filed on January 29, 2013. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:11 am
” 29 U. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:11 am
” 29 U. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm
Coon, posted December 1, 2014.) [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
But this does not mean that size is irrelevant. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 9:42 pm
"The law interpreting section 162.031(b) does not require . . . an explicit level of proof tying particular expenditures to the improvements at issue. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 12:38 pm
United States is a tricky classification case has to do with HTSUS Note 1 to Chapter 29, which states that "Except where the context otherwise requires, the headings of this Chapter apply only to: [certain products] with an added stabilizer (including anticaking agent) necessary for their preservation or transport. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:08 am
Does the distribution right under Article 4(1) of Directive 2001/29 include the right to offer the original or copies of the work to the public for sale? [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 3:34 am
[possibly 'no', courtesy of para 41 in the Cassina decision: "the concept of distribution to the public, otherwise than through sale, of the original of a work or a copy thereof, for the purpose of Article 4(1) of Directive 2001/29, applies only where there is a transfer of the ownership of that object. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am
The federal court on April 10 issued an injunction against A’lor which provides specifically: 1. [read post]
Article 29 Working Party Publishes Full Guidance On CJEU Right To Be Forgotten Ruling Against Google
2 Dec 2014, 5:02 am
Late last week, the Article 29 Working Party released a short press statement announcing that it had agreed guidance for the implementation of the May 2014 CJEU ruling against Google on the “right to be forgotten. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 10:02 pm
Originally scheduled to start on Dec. 29, the trial is expected to take two weeks. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:40 am
Scott submitted a proposal using USPS Priority Mail Express (1-day service). [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:45 am
Just as it seems inevitable that this issue will arise in Canada, it also seems inevitable that the Gonzales decision and the Article 29 Working Party Guideline will be referred to when it does. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Considering the seamen factors in 29 C.F.R. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 11:57 pm
It does not depend upon whether the belief turned out to be true or false. [read post]
