Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2012, 1:31 pm
R (on the application of T) v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
Find out the answer and have a bit of weekend fun by checking out this Sesame Street appearance in which Justice Sonia Sotomayor puts down her taza de café (she and her host kaffee-klatsch in Spanish as well as English) and struts her solomonic stuff:Hat tip to Bridget Crawford at Faculty Lounge for news of this appearance, which follows fast upon the interview between retired Justice John Paul Stevens, author of a stinging dissent in the campaign finance case, Citizens United… [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am
Despite the differences in approach, the Jones v Tsige case is of considerable interest to English lawyers. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 4:00 pm
French speaking respondents are also three times more likely to appreciate SMS as a way to be informed of the arrival of new decisions on the Lexum site (11% v. 4%). [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:44 am
Cameron v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:41 am
Don't Hand Out Rewards So Easily" pjblack.me/xaGR2h Stephen Fry (Image via RottenTomatoes.com) it's not just english judges: "Stephen Fry on the techno-cluelessness of English judges" pjblack.me/xlUF4N is violence explained by history, not biology or psychology? [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
The decision in Von Hannover v Germany (No. 2) is the second of two given on 7 February 2012 by the Grand Chamber concerning the balancing of privacy and freedom of expression. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:25 pm
The jury never saw the V-Plot video. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:37 am
On February 21, the Court will hear oral argument in Taniguchi v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
I’ve just finished reading the fascinating case of AMP v Persons Unknown [2011] EWHC 3454 (TCC) via the IP Osgoode blog. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:08 am
Comment The result is hardly surprising from the point of view of English law. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
The case is entitled Wingate v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:17 pm
White v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
In Ansell Limited v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
No such claim was available in English law as damages for bereavement are only available for the loss of a child where the child is under 18:[58]. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:48 am
It reiterated its previous finding in the case of Gregory v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1997, § 44, that the rule governing the secrecy of jury deliberations was a crucial and legitimate characteristic of English trial law which served to reinforce the jury’s role as the ultimate arbiter of fact and to guarantee open and frank deliberations among jurors. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:00 am
The only available guidance derives from DPP v Collins ([2006] UKHL 40), an appeal from the Divisional Court. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:11 pm
Case Law: Thornton v Telegraph Media Group, an offer of amends defence fails – Hugh Tomlinson QC Media Responsibility and Chris Jeffries Case Law: JIH v News Group Newspapers, anonymity regained – Edward Craven Case Law: Flood v Times Newspapers, Reynolds defence fails Strasbourg on Privacy and Reputation Part 3: “A balance between reputation and expression? [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
So were people who bought Greek decoders, imported them into England and used them for watching English Premier League football matches infringing copyright or anti-decryption rules -- or was it the FAPL and its cohorts which were the villains for perpetrating anti-competitive practices and dividing up the European Union into separate national markets? [read post]
