Search for: "J. C."
Results 7621 - 7640
of 19,483
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2015, 7:37 am
The fine was doubled in this instance in accordance with 300.282i) and j) of the Code due to the violation of the following sections of the Code with a high risk designation: 300.1210b and 300.3240a). [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 3:01 am
Is the passage of Bill C-51 a threat to individual privacy? [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 3:43 am
(c) (i) She committed a criminal offence by having sex with at least two boys at the school at which she taught. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 12:30 am
"Lowell J. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:26 am
Finally, the Borello test has five additional factors borrowed from the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) in making a determination of a worker’s classification: (i) the alleged employee’s opportunity for profit or loss depending on his managerial skill; (j) the alleged employee’s investment in equipment or materials required for his task, or his employment of helpers; (k) whether the service rendered requires a special skill; (l) the degree of permanence of the working… [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 8:14 am
Por el contrario, según los autores, el “symmetric entrenchment” por referéndum “es cónsono con los principios democráticos de nuestro ordenamiento constitucional”. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:02 pm
In terms of the claims under the Fair Trading Act, CPAA objected to (a) a flyer handed out by NZICA representatives at a University careers fair, (b) an advertisement placed by NZICA in two nationwide publications, and (c) comments made by NZICA’s then chief executive that were reported in a newspaper article. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:33 am
Editor's Note: Richard J. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:15 am
C. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:05 am
Christoph Thole, The differentiation between Brussels I and EIR in annex proceedings and the relation to art. 31 CMR On the occasion of the ECJ ruling (4.9.2014 – C-157/13), the author discusses the precedence of special conventions (CMR) according to art. 71 (1) Brussels I-reg. and the question of the criteria necessary for the application of art. 3 EIR. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
J. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm
Articles on the “Right to be Forgotten” Freedom of Expression and ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ Cases in the Netherlands after Google Spain, European Data Protection Law Review 2015-2, p. 113-125, Stefan Kulk and Frederik J. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:44 pm
C-13-3826 EMC (September 1, 2015). [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 6:40 am
On the other hand, “[j]anitors”; “[d]ishwashers”; “[c]hefs or cooks”; and “[l]aundry room attendants” are listed as non-tipped occupations. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 3:30 am
Erin C. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 3:30 am
Erin C. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
J. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 12:00 pm
Huertas Ortiz, Félix J. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:54 am
C. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:05 am
© 2015 Alexander J. [read post]
