Search for: "JOHN 2 DOE"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 13,842
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2013, 4:07 pm
Local attorney, John C. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 6:53 am
Article 12 does not define the term "settled." [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:51 am
While the romance does not violate any rules, it has raised concerns among some good government groups. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently declined to grant review in the very interesting case of Saint John’s Church in the Wilderness v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 12:48 pm
My mistake on that question does not undermine the main two points made in this post. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
The Bill does not provide for automatic legal representation in any category of case. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 3:38 am
Her view of Section 2(e)(4) is sometimes, but not always, followed.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 1:52 pm
On the return date of the applications, the parties named in the captions of the notice of claims stipulated that petitioners are permitted to serve and file a notice of claim in the names of "John Doe 1," "John Doe 2," and "John Doe 3" as pseudonyms to protect the identity of the infant petitioners in the above-entitled actions. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
But all of that will go into the mix in terms of John Kerry's decision or recommendation on this issue. [read post]
Precedential No. 31: TTAB Dismisses U. Alabama Opposition to HOUNDSTOOTH MAFIA & Design for Clothing
29 Jul 2013, 2:51 am
[TTABlogged here].Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 4:01 pm
She was 97 when she made the will, and died a year later.The will was drafted by an experienced lawyer, John Perry, who had taken instructions from her at her home in Smithers, British Columbia. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 9:32 pm
On this coming Friday, Aug. 2, the federal court for New Mexico is going to be filled with lawyers as it seems the number of parties in Front Range Equine Rescue v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 12:54 pm
But what does this mean, exactly? [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 9:17 am
However, that does not mean the worker center itself is always a labor organization under LMRDA. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:01 am
This post was written by John Feldman and Frederick Lah. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 3:26 am
The Board was unimpressed by these assertions: it refused to take judicial notice of any facts purportedly underlying these accusations, found no supporting evidence in the record, and saw no egregious conduct in opposer's conduct of the opposition.And so the Board sustained the opposition on the Section 2(d) ground, declining to reach opposer's dilution claim.Read comments and post your comments here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
John W. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 3:04 am
The PTO issued a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark IPEN, deeming it to be merely descriptive of digital pens and online retail store services featuring digital pens. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 7:30 am
In particular, California law does not specifically cover claims brought "in response to" government petitioning activity. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 5:42 am
Code § 1030(a)(1) and (a)(2), “or having accessed a computer with authorization, uses the opportunity such access provides for purposes to which such authorization does not extend”’. [read post]
