Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 13,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2015, 5:02 am
Rubenstein v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 10:12 am
Tobinick v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
In the case of Hatcher v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 6:43 am
Burchi The following documents have been filed in the Anderson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 12:40 pm
Supreme Court Mondy in Mullenix v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 10:21 am
In Gattuso v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
These four matters had been covered by the record label claimants and so Arnold J had no difficulty in finding all four matters established. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 3:43 am
TTABlogger comment: Doesn't seems worthy of the precedential label. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:19 pm
Burchi, James V. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:42 am
Cir. 2007); Magic Wand Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:23 am
But the expression "trade mark bullying" has entered common parlance, at least among trade mark practitioners, and I suppose that as a lexicographer - a label which I can't really fail to acknowledge - I am committed to accepting the way language is used, although under no obligation not to be critical about it.Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation [2016] EWCA Civ 455 (25 May 2016) is as unedifying a case of a big trade mark owner trying… [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 1:05 pm
So this means that no judge is "compelled" to decide X or non-X; instead, the judge has to engage in what Mark Tushnet has accurately labeled "judgment," which presumably includes what, overall, is best for the overall polity. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:04 am
Monster Energy Company v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:12 am
’: Materializing Cosmetics through Product Labels, 1947-1960Giulia Walter (University of Zurich) and Filippo Contarini (University of Lucerne)Fabrizio De André’s Storia di un ImpiegatoSeminar 5: Visual Legal Iconography (Thursday 23 June 3:00-6:30 pm BST)Valentin Jeutner (Lund University)The Relation between Law, Aesthetics and EmpathyAmanda Perry-Kessaris (University of Kent)Will Future Legal Histories be more Visual? [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 9:37 pm
Peter Crowley v United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (unreported, but noted on the Lawtel subscription-only service) is one of those cases that should never be allowed to happen. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 6:22 am
Young Hollywood LLC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 4:43 am
In part as a result of these efforts, the issue has come before multiple courts, with varying outcomes.In 2016 the issue reached the Supreme Court, which granted certiorari in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 5:12 am
., LLC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:58 pm
In his recent majority opinion in the watershed Carpenter v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 9:06 am
It was just a few months ago that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (BMB v Ferrero, C‑693/17 P) sided with well-known foodstuffs manufacturer Ferrero by upholding the invalidity of a registered Community design right for comfit boxes and containers pursuant to Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002. [read post]
