Search for: "Levell v. State"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 29,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
And even if Steve Calabresi is correct, as discussed in an earlier post, that at present Democrats control six of the twelve smallest states, it is also demonstrably true that these states are increasingly unrepresentative of the rich pluralism and multi-culturalism that typify the larger states. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 7:05 pm
-China Trade Talks, Encircling the United States). [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 4:10 pm
They also attempted to distinguish an earlier Court of Appeal decision, California State Auto Ass’n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
But California has enacted medical and recreational cannabis laws that eliminate any crimes at the state level. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 12:06 pm
On the "low level litigation" front, here's a neat little published opinion from the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
(A similar issue arises with map pinpoints in Airbnb, which are expressly designed not to be accurate at the street level). [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:48 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 8:20 am
In State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:00 am
" At a more theoretical level, perhaps, I think that Federalist 10 is the most vigorous attack ever written on the advisability of relying on the American states to protect the liberties of unpopular minorities. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
There legal academy, for better or worse, was dominated by liberals; defenders of the Old Order represented, say, by the attack on the New Deal leveled by the Supreme Court were by-and-large absent. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 5:02 am
While the state in Maine v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
See LaForte v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 1:44 pm
The case – Union of Medical Marijuana Patients v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 1:18 pm
Supreme Court’s 2014 ruling in Burrage v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 10:07 am
Clark v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 9:54 am
In Shanahan v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:45 am
Like the Mendez v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
That is the necessary implication of Rumsfeld v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 4:01 am
”[10] The issue of “healing” is effectively discarded in R. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
They have done so in Fort Bend County v. [read post]
