Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 7621 - 7640 of 21,108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2017, 1:27 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Plaintiff also claims that Defendant is vicariously liable for any profits realized by third parties through any third party’s downloading and use of the photo off of Defendants website. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 6:09 am by Joy Waltemath
The court later stayed the claims against the franchisees until it decided whether Jimmy John’s could be liable as a joint employer. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:57 pm by Jeffrey Neuburger
  Siding with the defendants, the lower court dismissed the claims against the self-publishing vendors, finding that their services were not “publishing,” rather they were distributors protected by the First Amendment and could not be liable for the claims allegedly committed using their technology. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:42 pm by Ben
The jury found that the Los Angeles-based investment firm, which manages $24.5 billion in assets, was liable for copying 39 issues and determined the damages for each instance was $15,000, according to the jury verdict. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 12:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Insured exclusion in the company’s policy states that the insurer “shall not be liable for Loss under this Coverage Section on account of any Claim” that is “brought or maintained by … any Insured in any capacity. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 10:01 am by Carl Neff
  Plaintiffs sought to hold the directors personally liable for the damages the Company suffered from the spill. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 10:31 pm by Anthony Zaller
California’s joint employer test “[T]he basis of liability is the defendants knowledge of and failure to prevent the work from occurring. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
  The claimant submitted that the defendant ought to be held liable for onward dissemination of the publications to other individuals identified as having read the words complained of but the Judge largely rejected this on the basis that the eventual disclosure the result of a sequence of unforeseeable events outside the defendants control. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 12:13 pm by Sharifi Firm, PLC
California’s Approach to Seatbelt Non-Use Evidence California takes an interesting approach when it comes to seatbelt non-use evidence in that courts allow a defendant to argue that a plaintiff’s failure to wear a seatbelt should factor into the jury’s determination of the reasonableness of the plaintiff’s conduct. [read post]
 On that basis, the court found that the processor was liable for the full amount of funds processed to and received by the other defendants. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:35 am by Eric Dama
For example, in one federal case arising in Texas, a relator claimed that the defendants violated the FCA by submitting reimbursement claims of hospice care expenses for patients who weren’t eligible for MHB, when the necessary doctor’s certifications incorrectly certified that they were terminally ill. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:15 am by Docket Navigator
[Plaintiff] and its counsel . . . shall show cause in writing why they should not be held liable for defendants’ attorney’s fees by virtue of this being an 'exceptional' case within the meaning of [35 U.S.C. [read post]
District Court for the District of Nevada held that the CAFA’s amount-in-controversy requirement cannot be aggregated when each plaintiff’s claims are wholly unrelated to the other and when the defendants are not jointly liable. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 4:30 pm by Hirsch & Lyon
  Given these circumstances, however, the defendant is likely to be held liable for your injuries. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 12:22 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Since the standard of proof is much lower in a civil case than a criminal case, this is even a stronger argument and juries are even more likely to find a defendant liable in a Boston drunk driving car accident lawsuit. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 10:02 am by James Innocent
If he wasn’t found criminally liable then so be it, but this whole situation reeks of negligence. [read post]