Search for: "Line v. State"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 28,133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2011, 9:35 am
Monday’s decision in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 7:20 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit: NAACP v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:50 am
Michael C. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:40 pm
(See Fairbank v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 9:28 am
The Court stated that using the certified record to prosecute administrative suspensions is a valid method still used by agencies and approved by the Court in Drake v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:36 pm
This provides a powerful line of argument because the U.S. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:52 am
A couple of seconds after Kendall walked around the corner, Richardson exited the store and joined Heffner on the curb; Gilbert remained inside, waiting in line at the cash register. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:39 am
However, as discussed in my previous post (here), this very line of reasoning was deemed an abuse of discretion by the Ninth Circuit in United Steel v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 1:13 pm
But that's what United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm
Accordingly, the court concluded that prejudice must be presumed under United States v Cronic, 466 US 648; 104 S Ct 2039; 80 L Ed 2d 657 (1984). [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Consider Lucia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm
June 30 is the latest the Court has sat since 1996, when the Justices took the bench on July 1 to issue just a single opinion, United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
In particular, we argued that unlike prayers used to open legislative sessions at the state legislative level (one of which was upheld by the Supreme Court, largely on the basis of unbroken historical tradition, in Marsh v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:49 am
The Grand Junction Police Department became aware of these posts when a tip line caller reported the postings. . . . [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
In Kansas v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:59 am
” Birdsong v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
How is this relevant for California v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:36 pm
The best interests of children are a primary consideration: see, for example, R (JS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) per Elias LJ at paras 42 to 46. [read post]
19 May 2009, 10:25 am
AsIs v. [read post]
