Search for: "Little v. Little" Results 7621 - 7640 of 39,476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2011, 8:18 am by Robert Wagner
Prior to this case, there was very little confusion about the standard of proof for invalidity. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 4:25 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS QC
The decision apparently gives little weight to the starting point of an assumed (in this case) finding of discrimination. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 9:59 am by Venkat Balasubramani
It was also surprising to see little or no discussion at all of robots.txt and LinkedIn’s behavior with respect to search engines generally. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
"  And look it does.When I first read the opinion, which discusses the relevant precedent at length, I thought:  "Okay, I guess the law is changing a little bit here. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
By contrast, under the federal government’s interpretation of the ACA, state governments are left with little meaningful choice. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 11:05 am
As long as the administrative determination is not irrational or arbitrary, this court will not interfere with it (id. at 499, see Matter of Little v County of Westchester; Matter of Thomas v Straub, 29 AD3d 595, 596 [2006]; Winnegar v County of Suffolk, 13 AD3d 382 [2004]; Matter ofFrederick v Civil Serv. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:45 am by Laura Donohue
”  Constitutional law does little to alleviate concern. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The Claimant in this case was not arrested, but that is probably of little significance in this context. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
And that’s what the Supreme Court did back in 2005 in Illinois v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:17 am by Michael Risch
Consider, for example, commercial v. residential strength detergents. [read post]