Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 70,966
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2021, 3:13 am
The Board found this case to be more like the latter.The addition of the term MUSIC does not create a different commercial impression because it is generic when used in connection with sound recordings and the production and distribution of sound recordings. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 8:43 pm
by Mark L. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Background The case, O.P.T. v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:00 am
” Mark Tushnet asks, why not? [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
* Tripp Trapp and the Third Dimension: a study in trade mark registrability Here’s the much awaited IPKat comment on Case C‑205/13 Hauck GmbH & Co. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
8 May 2015, 9:24 am
Also in 2012, Intrastate filled approximately 1,800 12–pack cases of 11–ounce bottles with Clearly Canadian product and sold 1,872 cases of Clearly Canadian beverages to GrayCo. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:11 am
In the event of a breach of this order, a penalty will be exacted to the value of EUR 10,000 per day or per event, as the case may be. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Yesterday I appeared on Mark Goldman’s “Where Accountants Go” podcast. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 4:23 pm
In this case, you start with 100 points, and everything is marked down. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Yesterday I appeared on Mark Goldman’s “Where Accountants Go” podcast. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:52 am
Does this example not provide a visual case for illustrating the difference between the right to register and the right to use? [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 7:12 am
In the case at hand, the Claimants had issued a claim for (a) trade mark infringement and (b) inducing a breach of contract. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 11:34 am
As usual, if you have any suggestions concerning important European trade mark cases that you'd like to see reported in the ETMR, let the IPKat know here (since two members of the IPKat blog team are responsible for the ETMR's editorial content). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:17 am
Anyway, I have close to zero interest in reading what Cohn has to say about this year's big case. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:40 am
In sum, the registered mark GULFSTREAM is entitled to more than a narrow scope of protection for Registrant's goods.Not surprisingly, the Board found the word GULFSTREAM to be the dominant portion of Applicant's mark. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 12:28 pm
The insurance company for the negligent driver typically pays a settlement for this type of case. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:47 am
"Comparing the two marks, we find that both are arbitrary marks beginning with an unusual “TVAR” or “TOVAR. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:53 am
The TTAB reiterated the Federal Circuit’s holding that, “In no case has this court ever held that one must have a specific commercial interest, not shared by the general public, in order to have standing as an opposer. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 5:41 am
If it shows scratches, abrasions or other marks on or inside the victim, that still is not evidence that a sexual assault occurred. [read post]