Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 7621 - 7640
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2015, 2:51 pm
Mark Adams is a partner in Jones Walker LLP‘s labor and employment practice. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 9:11 am
Statements that the standard Carroll applied to fire Potter "does not mark a change in our standards. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:11 am
Statements that the standard Carroll applied to fire Potter “does not mark a change in our standards. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:14 am
Straight from the Department of Shameless Self-Promotion: Mark your calendars! [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 6:31 am
Nevertheless, he seems to have got his answer in Case T-621/14 Infocit - Prestação de Serviços, Comércio Geral e Indústria, Lda v OHIM and, although the matter is by no means ‘hot news’ at this point, it still merits some discussion.Infocit lodged an application for a Community trade mark for the word “DINKOOL” in respect of several goods in classes 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 12, 16, 20 and 21. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:31 am
“Forget X; Y is what matters now. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Thirdly, the communication must be for the purpose of “seeking or giving advice with respect to any matter relating to the protection of a trade-mark, geographical indication or mark referred to in paragraph 9(1)(e), (i), (i.1), (i.3), (n) or (n.1)”. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
The July 14 announcement of an agreement clearly marked the conclusion of one particular process, the negotiations themselves. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 2:03 pm
But in the 10% of cases where it matters, the lawyers are up to speed. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:30 am
Powell, concurring) (internal quotation marks omitted))). [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:58 am
And if we can’t be sure, then what is an acceptable error rate? [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
” – isn’t this progression all to the good? [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
False-positive error rates for bite marks run as high as 64%. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:10 pm
Evidence is what’s going to prove a case either way, and victims can’t forget that witnesses leave the scene, surveillance footage is deleted, and skid marks on the road wash away. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
Its words hadn’t changed. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 6:25 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia affirming the cancellation by the United States Patent and Trademark Office of the Redskins mark may be real entertainment. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
The marks were invalidated almost a year ago by the Appeal Board, after they saw that the marks were disparaging to Native Americans under section 2(a) of the Lanham Act.* Were the condoms "made in Germany" and why does it matter? [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 1:57 am
A panel discussion will take place following the presentation of the two papers, led by Anna Carboni (partner, Redd solicitors and an Appointed Person to hear trade mark appeals), Paul Stevens (Olswang CEO and former head of litigation, Olswang LLP) and Mark Owen (Taylor Wessing). [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 1:54 pm
A panel discussion will take place following the presentation of the two papers, led by Anna Carboni (partner, Redd solicitors and an Appointed Person to hear trade mark appeals), Paul Stevens (Olswang CEO and former head of litigation, Olswang LLP) and Mark Owen (Taylor Wessing). [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
I imagine it matters to interior designers, and quite probably to Dids Macdonald and ACID too. [read post]
