Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 16,996
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2016, 12:00 am
Supreme Beef Processors, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
” Subsequently, Justice Scalia joined the 5-4 majority in Koontz v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
” Subsequently, Justice Scalia joined the 5-4 majority in Koontz v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
Connell is fine with that: “You know, people change their p [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:55 am
In Varkey Joseph v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm
However, once approved by the FAA, there is no specific mechanism to ensure that the airport will take any action to implement the noise compatibility program and protect people from the substantial harm presented by aircraft noise. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 7:20 pm
., EM Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Titanic v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:12 am
Maybe we need to balance incentives for marginal artists v. incentives for most popular, instead of incentives v. access. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 9:39 am
This is a common pattern in Apple v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:43 am
Background The Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 received Royal Assent on 27 March 2014. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:14 pm
A current case that foreshadows this is the decision in Garcia v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 11:59 am
Uber Promotions, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 11:11 am
The prosecutor in a first-degree murder case uses his peremptory challenges to strike nine African-American jurors, leaving only one African-American on the jury, which ultimately convicts.The California Court of Appeal says there's no Batson violation, but the trial court disagrees and grants habeas relief.The Ninth Circuit reverses.The panel consists of Judge Ikuta -- who authors the opinion -- Judge O'Scannlain, and a senior district court judge sitting by designation.P.S. -… [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:09 am
Franklin v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Yee 15-169Issue: (1) Whether the Ninth Circuit’s judgment in this case should be granted, vacated, and remanded in light of Horne v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:55 pm
The only Scalia quips that seem to have made it into a post were two he made during FCC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:54 am
See generally See v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:27 am
” That, too, would be unconstitutional, though under the Fourth Amendment: As the court held in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
