Search for: "People v. To" Results 7621 - 7640 of 73,015
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2022, 5:27 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Currently, few protections exist to prevent personal reproductive health data or information about people seeking reproductive health services – collected by apps and websites – from being used to target or arrest people in states where abortion is criminalized. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm by Dani Selby
Though the anti-sodomy laws were declared unconstitutional in the 2003 Supreme Court decision, Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:32 pm by Shaw Drake
For over 50 years, under the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bivens v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 12:50 pm
I know that we're (theoretically) execute the defendant, which provides some measure of (theoretical) justice. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:30 am by Josh Blackman
"Constitutional rights are enshrined with the scope they were understood to have when the people adopted them. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:08 am by Eric Goldman
This provision especially seems to target UGC features, where people always say mean things that upset other users. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:27 am by Florian Mueller
OK, some antitrust enforcement accelerated its adoption--but that's precisely what is needed against Apple's single-browser-engine policy now.The 2020 United States et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 8:57 am by Lenese Herbert
ShareOn Thursday, the Supreme Court released its opinion in Vega v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:59 am
Similarly, some people might feel influenced by the views of these other people, the Justices, because they are smarter and more educated and have immersed themselves deeply in the subject.The question was asked in terms of rights, and many people will interpret that to mean federal constitutional rights. [read post]