Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 20,854
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2016, 1:50 pm
The New Jersey Appellate Division recently considered the implications of an assignment in Haskell Properties, LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 11:30 am
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), the Supreme Court held that states cannot collect sales... [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 10:10 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:27 pm
The petition of the day is: Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 3:59 pm
" The court then ruled that "all proceeds" traceable drug trafficking are subject to forfeiture, even if they are increased due to a windfall.The People of the State of Illinois v. $35,315 United States Currency, 2016 IL App (4th) 150685. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 12:35 pm
This ruling should help prevent deceptive marketing and sale of foreign imports as having been made in the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 9:55 am
Added: “Valve ordered to stop all gambling-related skin transfers by Washington State Gambling Commission” (The Esports Observer) Case citation: McLeod v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 3:00 am
Here’s an excerpt: The question before the Court in Salman v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 1:41 am
In Pfaff v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:24 am
City of Wyoming v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:56 pm
Geir v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 4:35 pm
Furthermore, The Editors Code of Practice which states “Everyone is entitled to respect for his or her private and family life, home, health and correspondence, including digital communications”. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 10:37 am
GRASCH v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 8:15 am
City officials believe the Supreme Court’s widely reviled Kelo v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:48 am
A 38–page document was attached to the State's motion, consisting of approximately 105 text messages and 112 Facebook Messenger messages `that appear to relate to illicit drug sales’ and were compiled by the Effingham police department high-tech crime investigation unit.People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:21 am
Hasemann v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
United States, 491 U.S. 617, 624-25 (1989) (noting and accepting the government’s concession on this score); United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 3:08 am
The state court held that it was bound by a 2011 California Intermediate Appellate Court decision in the case of Luther v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 10:49 pm
Teixeira v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 11:37 am
Perfection is usually completed by filing a UCC-1 with the Secretary of State’s office. [read post]
