Search for: "State v House"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 28,333
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2019, 4:09 pm
As Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in Matel v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
The debtors received a refund of $684 from the state on July 9, 2009. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:06 pm
Sales taxes – Tax law allows you to deduct your local and state sales taxes. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:34 am
Rachael Hanna summarized pre-sentencing hearings in the United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:49 am
Hespeth v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:25 am
Wizkids/NECA, LLC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:20 am
The proposed standard is an expression of the collection limitation principle as reframed in the White House Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights as “focused collection,” articulated as “a right to reasonable limits on the personal data that companies collect and retain. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:35 am
Drug Enforcement Administration bumped CBD from a Schedule I classification to the much lower Schedule V. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:33 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:06 am
The Horizon Comics Productions v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 2:28 pm
Watson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
” A civil lawsuit was filed (Smith v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
The complaint emphasizes a 2012 report from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), in which the committee noted that it could “not prove wrongdoing” but that Huawei had failed to proactively alleviate congressional security concerns. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
Through this posturing, the ultra-conservative members of both houses can impress their base and hope against hope that one of these laws will lead to the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:20 am
Part V assesses how NLHs and their host states affect each other, including hubs’ positive spillover effects and host state pushback. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
Citing the House of Lords decision, Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd (2009), the Court recognised that to adopt a corrective construction: “it should be clear that something has gone wrong with the language and it should be clear what a reasonable person would have understood the parties to have meant”. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:25 am
A State Supreme Court Justice has preliminary enjoined the County of Rockland from imposing an "Emergency Declaration" preventing any unvaccinated children under the age of 18 from entering any "place of public assembly," defined as any place where 10 or more people congregate, including schools.The case is W.D. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 2:32 pm
R (OAO Harris) v London Borough of Islington. [read post]
