Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 7621 - 7640
of 15,316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 12:52 am
Bearing this in mind, Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM, Carolus C. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 4:13 am
Current TPP negotiation member states are the United States, Japan, Mexico, Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Chile, Singapore, Peru, Vietnam, New Zealand and Brunei. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 6:55 am
The basis for the ruling in Kingsdown Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 4:18 am
., v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 4:18 am
., v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 2:26 pm
This week the Ontario Court of Appeal released a much awaited decision in the case of Westerhof v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:53 am
” (Navarro v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 3:08 pm
Icon-IP Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 12:09 pm
In today’s case (Cabezas v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:56 am
Code § 160(b); see also DelCostello v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am
Purporting to follow the Supreme Court’s guidance on customary international law in Sosa v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 3:18 pm
” (Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc v Shiu, Dkt No 14-1111, petition filed March 12, 2015). [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:32 am
Along with this, courts also consider several additional factors: (a) whether the one performing services is engaged in a distinct occupation or business; (b) the kind of occupation, with reference to whether, in the locality, the work is usually done under the direction of the principal or by a specialist without supervision; (c) the skill required in the particular occupation; (d) whether the principal or the worker supplies the instrumentalities, tools, and the place of work for… [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:28 am
Here’s my take on today’s Supreme Court decision in B&B Hardware v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:09 pm
Disease Burden from Viral Hepatitis A, B, and C in the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
" State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:07 pm
Burwell Supreme Court Oral Argument Read Transcript of King v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
The answer is clear from C-182/14 P MEGA Brands International v OHIM (the 'MAGNEXT' case), in which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) set aside the General Court's decision and remitted the action for further consideration.As already reported by the IPKat here, the story began when the Luxembourg company MEGA Brands applied for two CTMs for MAGNEXT. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:17 pm
(B) Driving while intoxicated, driving under the influence, and operating while impaired (§ 50‑2201.05); (C) A misdemeanor offense for which sex offender registration is required pursuant to Chapter 40 of Title 22, whether or not the registration period has expired; (D) Criminal abuse of a vulnerable adult (§ 22‑936(a)); (E) Interfering with access to a medical facility (§ 22‑1314.02); (F) Possession of a pistol by a convicted felon (§… [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 10:16 am
Hoyle’s Claims The trial court granted summary judgment to the Employers on the (A) and (B) claims, but did not determine the merits of Hoyle’s claim under subsection (C), the deliberate removal of the equipment safety guard. [read post]
