Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 8,952
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2010, 6:33 am
In response to readers’ questions, Eugene Volokh explains at the Volokh Conspiracy why United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:43 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:55 pm
Eugene Kontorovich passes along the news about United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
There are four federal judicial districts in California -- Northern, Eastern, Central and Southern. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
See Arizonans for Official English, 520 U.S. at 67.Proponents' intervention in the district court does not provide them with standing to appeal. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 pm
Forum Non Conveniens in US Courts On May 1, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals... [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:52 am
Wackenhut Corrections Corporation, (cause no. 02-110) in the District Court, 404th Judicial District, Willacy County, Texas, is being administered under the insurance program established by The Wackenhut Corporation, our former parent company, in which we participated until October 2002. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 7:52 am
District Court in Phoenix is a private challenge to the health care bill championed by President Barack Obama. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:11 pm
We vacated and remanded to the district court in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Green Tree Financial Corp. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:09 am
United States First Circuit, 08/04/2010 IMS Health Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:12 am
Mattel, Inc. (2008) 552 U.S. 576, 579-580, 128 S.Ct. 1396, 170 L.Ed.2d 254, that no enhanced merits based judicial review may be conducted in a United States District Court under the Federal Arbitration Act pursuant to the litigants' stipulation. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:23 am
It covers each of the fifty states of the United States, the District of Columbia, the 12 federal Circuit Courts of Appeal and the U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:21 am
In Dees v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 4:27 am
Consultants, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 11:42 am
The district court agreed.The Eleventh Circuit eventually agreed. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am
But definitely the first two. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:50 am
On its face, the 5-4 decision is simple enough, as a majority of the Court concluded that its 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:37 pm
Court of Appeals noted on Goss Int’l Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:28 pm
In the end, what stands out is that the five Justices comprising the McDonald plurality were the same five Justices that decided the majority opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm
The court took judicial notice of the first court's ruling, and under the doctrine of collateral estoppel, found that Bookout had failed to prove causation as to all the defendants except the Railroad. [read post]
