Search for: "State v. Howes" Results 7621 - 7640 of 72,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2009, 10:11 am
  To see why, we will need to begin by reviewing the story of how other constitutional rights came to be incorporated against the states. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe reports for this blog, in a post that first appeared at Howe on the Court, that yesterday a Louisiana abortion clinic filed a cert petition asking the Supreme Court to strike down a state law requiring abortion providers to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals; the justices had put the law on hold in February, in June Medical Services v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
It is a great grief to me, (meaning himself the said Seth,) to see how the poor people (meaning the people of this Sate) are oppressed by the Laws of this State, (meaning that the several Laws of this State, which require and make necessary the owning of Personal or Real Estate, as a qualification of Voters in such Meetings, were tyrannical and oppressive,) and I am determined to vindicate their cause as long as I live. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by Serena Mayeri
If marriage is a “basic civil right,” as Loving declared, then how could the state deprive gay and lesbian Americans of that right? [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 2:17 pm
Traffic rules demand a certain amount of uniformity, which is why most guidelines governing how cars move through space are dictated at the state level. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 10:43 am
  Especially when you're highlighting just how right the slaveholders were. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:08 am by Richard Renner
Kohn and I are filing a "friend of the court" brief urging the United States Supreme Court to accept review of, and reverse, the First Circuit's decision in Lawson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:18 am by Rosalind English
Although Convention rights theoretically form part of the “principles” of EU law, this case is a neat illustration of how the states’ duties under the two regimes are subtly different, and how attentive the courts have to be to the individual circumstances of the case. [read post]