Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 13,225
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2013, 10:31 am
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:17 pm
Supreme Court heard argumentin Fair Trade Commission v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 4:27 pm
Distributions are not made in proportion to ownership interest, or physician-owners pay different prices for their ownership interests, because of the expected or actual volume or value of devices used by the physicians. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 6:00 pm
Learn what happened after the jump.The bar is the Houlihan's in Brick, New Jersey and the case is Pauly v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 4:16 am
In Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 7:25 am
Joseph Abbey v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:10 pm
AutoDesk) Wiley Publishing v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:04 pm
The background to Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:04 pm
Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:39 am
The Supreme Court of the United States issued its much-anticipated decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:55 am
Before yesterday’s ruling in the Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:45 am
Under federal law, minimum resale price maintenance has been considered lawful if reasonable under the circumstances since the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
As the Supreme Court stated in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:15 pm
Weighing in on more than just gTLDs, Scott Turow has stated that he believes “[t]he resale of e-books would send the price of new books crashing,” because “[w]ho would want to be the sucker who buys the book at full price when a week later everyone else can buy it for a penny? [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 11:47 am
In so ruling, the Court clarified questions left behind by cases such as Quality King v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am
My first involvement in such a case was in a case called Pearson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:32 am
As the Court stated in Frangos, fair market value based on comparable sales is determined by “making adjustments for prices of those [comparables] that are more similar or dissimilar to condemned property. [read post]
