Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 13,701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
Foreigners registered very few marks of their own. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 4:28 pm
People v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:28 am
Consider Grove City College v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
Not only that, but it refused to acknowledge the ruling by the South Carolina Supreme Court in 2009 in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:26 am
In re Cook Medical Technologies LLC, 105 U.S.P.Q.2d 1377 (TTAB 2012) [precedential], involving teal and blue medical devices, the Board stated in dictum that Section 18 is available to restrict the color in a registered mark. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:52 am
” Since the Supreme Court’s 1978 opinion in Oliphant v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:44 am
Here is the opinion in Rayellen Resources Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:26 am
However, coexistence must be on the market and not just in the register. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 2:31 pm
• Legal counsel should be aware that the attorney-client privilege would be impacted by the new DOL regulations, if finalized in their proposed form, thereby raising a potential conflict between state bar and federal LMRDA requirements, among other things. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:41 am
Undeterred by the narrow question on which the Court granted cert., thirteen state petitioners ask it to overrule Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:38 am
Case Background In Gulino v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
Is Article 5(1) and (3) of Directive 2008/95 ... to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks to be interpreted in such a way that it must be viewed as constituting “[use] in the course of trade” of a trade mark in a Member State if an undertaking enters into an agreement via a website in a third country for the sale and dispatch of goods bearing the trade mark to a private purchaser with an address known to the vendor in the Member… [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 5:27 am
In a case handed down last week, United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:35 am
The revised regulations were published in the Federal Register on September 24, 2013 (78 FR 58614–58679 and 78 FR 58682-58752). [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 3:08 am
-registered broker-dealer unaffiliated with our company. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:55 pm
” Castellano v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:35 pm
US v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:35 pm
US v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 11:17 am
In Steginsky v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 3:06 am
Cir. 2009); Torres v. [read post]
