Search for: "United States v. Doe" Results 7621 - 7640 of 44,319
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Elgizouli v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] 2 WLR 857 The case concerns the UK’s stance on the application of mutual legal assistance to the United States where doing so may result in the death penalty being carried out. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 11:20 am by Eric Goldman
Oct. 21, 2020): “because the infringing act of downloading the material occurred on a computer outside the United States, there was no act in the United States to establish jurisdiction” * Donat v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:55 am by Thomas Key
 Last week, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware ruled that this "passive" ownership and operation does not constitute a volitional act and, thus, does not constitute actionable copyright infringement. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 7:41 pm by Josh Blackman
Neither Wisconsin nor the United States has introduced data sufficient to show that disarming all nonviolent felons substantially advances its interest in keeping the public safe. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 7:19 pm by Russell Knight
Most jurisdictions in the United States have the concept of “waiving service. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 10:49 am by Sean Vanderfluit
Of note, at the outset of its analysis, the BCCA stated that in cases that did not involve final determination of a case that originated before the SCC issued Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 6:11 am by Magdaleen Jooste
  On December 14, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Adaptive Streaming Inc. v. [read post]
This provision does not take effect until the state elects to participate in this section and becomes effective on the later of the date of election or the enactment of this provision. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 12:46 pm by Giles Peaker
Mrs Nur does not work because of her caring responsibilities for Z and is therefore in receipt of state welfare benefits. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 3:15 pm by Marta Belcher
The regulation’s authors write that this abbreviated comment period is required to deal with the “threats to United States national interests” posed by these technologies, but they provide no factual basis for this claim. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
Specifically, the defendant argues the evidence does not show that he used actual force, fraud, or trickery to remove the victim. [read post]