Search for: "Wells v. State" Results 7621 - 7640 of 66,688
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2016, 5:15 pm by INFORRM
Second, the Court stated that as a result of the applicants’ actions the publishers were already obliged to pay 68% of the damages sought. [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 Langton v Sussman & Watkins2025 NY Slip Op 02765Decided on May 7, 2025Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided on May 7, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 Langton v Sussman & Watkins2025 NY Slip Op 02765Decided on May 7, 2025Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided on May 7, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 1:25 pm
He explained the makeup of the request packets and response packets, including the source and destination IP address on the packets, as well as some of the header information such as the request of the file by its file hash, and the header fields showing KaZaA username and KaZaA IP address. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:42 pm
I return from a (well-earned) vacation in Hawaii with my family to read this opinion from the California Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 11:32 pm
Court review of university decisions concerning the appointment of faculty limitedPerinpanayagam v University At Buffalo & State Univ. of N. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 5:27 pm
This potentially could bode well for the anticipated ruling in Wyeth v. [read post]
” The 5th Circuit also acknowledged that the states that have not brought suit “may well have accepted and even endorsed the vaccination rule” and predicted that CMS would prevail on its effort to limit the scope of the injunction. [read post]