Search for: "v. Smith"
Results 7621 - 7640
of 16,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2011, 4:16 am
Plaintiff's claim that had he not resigned, he may have been able to hide his fraudulent activities, [*4]continue to collect fees, and reach an agreement with OCM is purely speculative and does not raise a triable issue of fact (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434-436 [2007]; GUS Consulting Gmb, 74 AD3d at 679; Phillips-Smith Speciality Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759… [read post]
20 May 2010, 4:12 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged in March about the court’s rejecting the religious accommodation claim in this case, but the court (in Jama v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Smith. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 8:21 am
Last week (August 30th), the First Department reviewed the law in this area in Mulhall v Hannafin, 2007 NY Slip Op 06529. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 7:37 am
Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals reverses convictions against North Dakota simulcast horseracing operator but cautions that all off track betting that takes place by phone or online may be illegal. 053688P.pdf 03/06/2007 United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 7:23 am
The ruling in Adams v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 11:37 am
The case is Halim v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 1:39 pm
CGL - BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT - "FOR THE MUTUAL BENEFIT OF" DOES NOT MEAN "REQUIRED TO NAME" Kassis v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:07 am
The Court of Appeal for Ontario has released its decision in A.M.R.I. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:01 am
Smith, Assistant Attorney General.Facts/Discussion: Simmons entered guilty pleas on separate charges in Wyoming and Nevada. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:15 am
Strang, The (Re)Turn to History in Religion Clause Law and Scholarship, (Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 81, No. 5, p. 1697, 2006).Gerard V. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
” That was my reaction to Gustavas v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:59 pm
Smith v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:09 am
The theory of Smith [v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 11:19 pm
Maynard — and then suggested by the concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:51 pm
Smith, the district court should have granted its motion to bring the case back to federal court. [read post]
30 May 2011, 7:50 am
Now that we know United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 3:30 am
” ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
