Search for: "All Other Claimants" Results 7641 - 7660 of 12,893
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2013, 1:28 pm
In any event it made no difference, as all the glasses involved were high waisted. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:48 am by Kirk Jenkins
 For all these reasons, the majority concluded that the claimant was not a “traveling employee. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 9:47 am by Greg Mersol
  At the other; larger cases with greater amounts that settle quickly that may result in a windfall. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 9:47 am by Greg Mersol
  At the other; larger cases with greater amounts that settle quickly that may result in a windfall. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:14 am by Charon QC
This clearly puts the claimant in a rather awkward position. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:39 am by Ann Caresani
” By placing boundaries on the appeal and litigation process, ERISA and the plan terms can control the extent to which one participant’s choices can drive up costs for all the other participants. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Isn’t that what the Affordable Care Act “employer mandate” is all about? [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 2:32 am by Jon Gelman
It calculated that Wheeler found black lung in about 2% of the cases evaluated, and that in 80% of the films he read as positive, he saw only early stage of the disease, whereas other physicians found severe form of the disease in more than 750 films. [read post]
However, as the claimant’s barrister has said; ‘1986 was not the primitive ages’. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am by Marty Lederman
§ 18023(b)(1).So are these cases about nothing at all? [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 5:09 am by Jay Causey
  It calculated that Wheeler found black lung in about 2% of the cases evaluated, and that in 80% of the films he read as positive, he saw only early stage of the disease, whereas other physicians found severe form of the disease in more than 750 films. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 5:06 am
  Most of the other changes we fought for were ultimately accepted, but not on the cy pres front.But lately we’re more optimistic. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 2:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
If all the government has to do is require something benefitting third parties in order for it to trigger a compelling interest, then all religious freedom challenges (and challenges in other areas of constitutional law) fail the compelling interest prong of strict scrutiny, because they all challenge a government command, and that command is nearly always defended based on its alleged need to protect third parties. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:50 am
After the insurer issued two reservation of rights letters and a letter to the general contractor denying the subcontractor's liability, the general contractor and the insured subcontractor reached a settlement, which included delay and other damages but no allocation between the types of damages settled. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:26 am by Gregorgy Dell
The Court notes that under applicable law "regular occupation" is not defined so narrowly as to include only the characteristics of [a claimant's] job, it must be defined as a position of the "same general character" as [a claimant's] job." [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:26 am by Gregory Dell
The Court notes that under applicable law "regular occupation" is not defined so narrowly as to include only the characteristics of [a claimant's] job, it must be defined as a position of the "same general character" as [a claimant's] job." [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:20 am by Nitin Pardal
Pursuant to section 33(1) of the Employment Insurance Act, "a claimant is not entitled to receive benefits if the claimant loses an employment because of misconduct or voluntarily leaves without just cause." [read post]