Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court"
Results 7641 - 7660
of 9,064
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2010, 7:30 am
Ashby Jones at the WSJ Law Blog rounds up news coverage of the Court’s order in the Arizona campaign-financing case, as did SCOTUSblog’s round-up yesterday. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:04 am
" The first sentence is true, but, for better or (in my opinion) for worse, the Supreme Court has already authorized racial profiling in immigration enforcement, and held that race-based stops do not violate the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:10 am
Those convictions are on appeal to the Utah Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 9:20 pm
Tuesday's order means that Arizona's law will not apply until the Supreme Court... [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 11:24 am
Arizona. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 10:18 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 10:18 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
Arizona, in which the Supreme Court ruled that police who take a suspect into custody and plan to interrogate him or her must inform that suspect of certain specific rights. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:15 am
Supreme Court continued its overhaul of the nation's campaign-financing laws when it barred officials in Arizona from providing matching funds to candidates for state office who accept public financing. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:12 am
Aside from the coverage of the Court’s order in the Arizona case, the media’s focus has largely returned to Elena Kagan’s nomination. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 6:02 am
Speers, 2010 WL 2176083 (Arizona Court of Appeals 2010). [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 5:44 am
Last year was the Big Year for 4th Amendment cases in the US Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 5:38 am
" The Arizona Republic reports that "Supreme Court blocks Arizona candidates' matching funds. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:38 pm
State, 2from the Florida Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 1:26 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday issued an order [text, PDF] temporarily blocking the state of Arizona from releasing campaign subsidies to publicly funded candidates under the state's campaign finance reform law [Title 16, Chapter 6, Article 2]. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:26 am
” She discusses the District Court ruling against the Arizona law — the ruing that the Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to allow to take effect.) [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am
Also at the Sentencing Law Blog, Berman examines the question that the Court certified to the Montana Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:58 am
Arizona—the 1966 Supreme Court that established the following prophylactic rules for warning criminal suspects taken into police custody: 1) right to remain silent, 2) anything a suspect says can be used against him in a court of law, 3) suspect has right to have an attorney present during police questioning, and 4) if the suspect cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to him prior to police questioning. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:25 pm
In accordance with our precedent and the precedent of the United States Supreme Court, we conclude that under the totality of the circumstances, the waiver of the defendant‘s rights against self-incrimination was not voluntary, knowing, and intelligent, and the statements were not voluntarily given. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Supreme Court review of the issue. [read post]
