Search for: "Bodie v Bodie"
Results 7641 - 7660
of 21,354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2019, 2:52 am
In the recent IPOS decision of Harvard Club of Singapore v President and Fellows of Harvard College [2019] SGIPOS 14, the President and Fellows of Harvard College (the body corporate constituting Harvard University) (“Applicant”) filed two applications to register “HARVARD CLUB OF SINGAPORE” and “HARVARD UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE” in Class 41, both for “Club Services [education or entertainment]”. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:17 am
A number of commentators have criticized the path we charted in Whren v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 5:00 am
One was Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 8:10 am
Aiello and G.E. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:58 am
Krishnan v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:47 am
Heinz Company v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:05 pm
By Brian Russell Nick v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:58 am
Krishnan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:51 am
In the EU, Huawei v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
For some time now -- ever since ECUSA's unilateral decision to consecrate V. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:15 am
Bowers v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 4:56 am
In an interesting decision from last month, the General Court considered that - despite the generally high level of attention of the target public for the Class 5 goods – the figurative sign (depicted below) was confusingly similar to the German word mark ‘MEA’.BackgroundIn May 2015, Almea Ltd (the Applicant), applied to register the following figurative sign as an EU trade mark (EUTM):Registration was sought for various goods in Classes 3 (face and body masks, cosmetics,… [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 2:38 pm
Body Dynamics, Inc. d/b/a BDI Marketing, Case No. 08-12711 (E.D. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 6:14 pm
While the EPO does claim to use a novelty test, the guidelines do indeed stress that an explicit disclosure is not necessary, and, especially in priority questions there is a body of case-law that talks about having the same idea, i.e. again not quite explicit disclosure. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:48 am
”In State of Florida v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:44 am
(Separately, a parallel private action, Ploss v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:41 pm
See Nken v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:13 am
Such a reading would be inconsistent with the emerging body of law upholding the admission of instant messages even when the author cannot be known with certainty. . . . [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
A pupil at the school attached the head of Dr Louis Dey and the school principal to those bodies and placed the school badge to obscure their hands and genitals. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 9:06 am
Provost v. [read post]
