Search for: "Child v. Child" Results 7641 - 7660 of 31,295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2015, 1:07 pm
You'd think that if you were in the process of trying to get a teaching job in the public schools, you could keep to yourself -- or at least not express to the people reviewing your suitability for the job - that you think that the age of consent should be zero, that online child predation should be legal, that most students with disabilities are "faking" it, that there's no substantial benefit to mainstreaming disabled students, that you think about suicide "every… [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm
Sure, the California Supreme Court is left-leaning in a lot of areas, but sometimes when reading an opinion (or otherwise), you don't need a weathervane to know which way the wind blows.Here's a test: See if you can fill in the blank for the next word in this opinion, the first paragraph of which reads (in its entirety):"A jury convicted Manuel Bracamontes of the first degree murder of nine-year-old Laura Arroyo, with special circumstances for committing the murder while engaged in… [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:50 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Madrigal v Tellez, ______F3d_____, (5th Cir., 2017) Jorge Carlos Vergara Madrigal (Vergara) and Angelica Fuentes Tellez (Fuentes) were the parents of two young daughters, ages five and three years. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 8:14 am by Joel R. Brandes
          In Jacksic v Serif, Not Reported in F.Supp.3d, 2014 WL 6685375 (D.Ariz.) on October 1, 2005, Jaksic and Serif were married in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:19 am
  It reminded me of Kennedy's opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm by Rick Pildes
  That is one of the more intriguing questions spawned by yesterday's decision in the child pornography case, Paroline v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:58 am
AM (Ethiopia) and others v Entry Clearance Officer [2008] EWCA Civ 1082; [2008] WLR (D) 329 “The principle that support or funding from a third party could not be relied on by a prospective entrant to the United Kingdom under r 297(v) of the Immigration Rules (HC 395), where the entrant was a child of a parent or a relative settled here, was applicable to r 281, where the entrant was a spouse or partner, and r 317, where he was a parent, grandparent or other… [read post]