Search for: "Doe 5" Results 7641 - 7660 of 86,241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2013, 5:07 pm by Joey Fishkin
Amazingly, the Court today does not answer this question at all. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 2:12 am by Kluwer IP Reporter
Angolan trademark registration certificates for medicines to bear disclaimer Recently, the Angolan Institute of Industrial Property (IAPI) issued Notice 9/2022, which mandates all trademark registration certificates for pharmaceutical products in class 5 to carry a disclaimer that the certificate does not grant an approval to the drug for commercial purposes. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:34 am by John Floyd
“Guilty” does not always mean actual guilt, especially in drug cases involving African-American defendants who elect to plead guilty in the Harris County Criminal Justice Center. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:56 am by Ellen C. Ham, Partner, FordHarrison LLP
Anyone catch TV Land’s Younger last week (season 5, episode 9)? [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 7:34 am by Joel Cockerell
On 5 October 2018, the English Court of Appeal confirmed the High Court decision in National Challenge Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 4:59 pm
To repeat, under CPL 180.40, the District Attorney does not have the power to reduce. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 4:54 pm by Nick Robinson
Since Jan Chaukidar held that a person in police custody does not fit the qualifications to be “chosen to fill a seat” of the House of the people or the Legislative Assembly, does this not mean that he/she cannot continue as member of Parliament or the State Legislature as well if he/she is taken in police custody? [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:56 pm by Jeff Gamso
 The Constitution, after all, means only and precisely what 5 members of the Supreme Court say it does. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:03 am by John Jascob
At least two other circuits, however, do not impose a mens rea requirement in the Rule 10b-5 context. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:58 pm
 But even then, I'll just say, as the Court of Appeal does here, "Oh, sure, I knew my policy only provided $5 in coverage and the statutory minimum is $15,000, but it's possible that my customers were self-insuring for the additional $14,995, or buying 3,000 $5 policies and 'stacking' them to satisfy the minimum. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 5:00 am by James Edward Maule
How does someone scraping by on basement wages set aside 4 to 5 percent of income, let alone 15 to 20 percent? [read post]
(Pg. 5) It’s hard to imagine how identifying a person who was previously anonymous does anything but diminish privacy—a literally faceless watcher now knows who I am. [read post]